Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentive-Aware Learning for Large Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a highly heterogeneous set of auctions, and to optimize any of the auction parameters, one needs to cluster this set into smaller, more homogeneous, clusters. However, to ensure that no advertiser can manipulate this process, it is crucial that no advertiser has a large market share in any cluster (see [12] for a theoretical justification of this statement). Hence, keywords must be clustered such that no advertiser is over-represented in any cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a highly heterogeneous set of auctions, and to optimize any of the auction parameters, one needs to cluster this set into smaller, more homogeneous, clusters. However, to ensure that no advertiser can manipulate this process, it is crucial that no advertiser has a large market share in any cluster (see [12] for a theoretical justification of this statement). Hence, keywords must be clustered such that no advertiser is over-represented in any cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartline and Roughgarden [2009], Shen and Tang [2017] and Bachrach et al [2014] provide mechanisms that can tradeoff among different objectives. There is also a rich literature on multi-item auctions [Cai et al, 2012;Daskalakis et al, 2013;Wang and Tang, 2014;Yao, 2014;Tang and Wang, 2017;Yao, 2017], and on repeated auctions motivated by online advertising [Amin et al, 2013;Amin et al, 2014;Kanoria and Nazerzadeh, 2014;Balseiro et al, 2017;Epasto et al, 2018;Tang and Zeng, 2018].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these works assume that bidders are myopic: they can strategize within individual auctions, but do not consider the impact of their bids on future auctions. Robustness to non-myopic has recently been studied in (Kanoria and Nazerzadeh, 2014;Epasto et al, 2018). A common idea is to limit the influence of any particular bidder either by assuming a large number of bidders, or imposing a cost associated with manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%