2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence, mechanism and risk factors for injury in youth rock climbers

Abstract: Injury risk is high in youth climbers. Findings are consistent with the reported rates, types and mechanisms in adults. Modifiable risk factors warrant further investigation to inform the development of injury prevention strategies, targeting high-risk climbers including adolescents and those with previous injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from six studies that sampled injuries from indoor climbing environments was 2.83 ± 5.14/1000hrs (3-7, 10). The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from two studies that sampled injuries from indoor and outdoor climbing environments was 2.32 ± 4.00/1000hrs (8,9). The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from two studies that sampled injuries that occurred during competition climbing was 1.92 ± 1.67/1000hrs (5, 7).…”
Section: Incidence Of Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from six studies that sampled injuries from indoor climbing environments was 2.83 ± 5.14/1000hrs (3-7, 10). The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from two studies that sampled injuries from indoor and outdoor climbing environments was 2.32 ± 4.00/1000hrs (8,9). The mean + standard deviation incidence rate of injury from two studies that sampled injuries that occurred during competition climbing was 1.92 ± 1.67/1000hrs (5, 7).…”
Section: Incidence Of Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 2011, Draper et al (2011b) published a paper highlighting such discrepancies and the resultant problems consequently arising for researchers attempting to make comparisons between studies. However, since that paper was published, the non-consistency in reporting has continued (Amca et al, 2012;Morenas Martín et al, 2013;Laffaye et al, 2014;Woollings et al, 2014;Young et al, 2014). The climbers, coaches and researchers present at the 2014 International Rock Climbing Research Congress developed this position statement as a call to all involved in climbing research to follow a consistent method for reporting climber characteristics, nomenclature for ability grouping and to propose the use of one IRCRA scale in all statistical analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our survey did not assess the use of preventive taping of the fingers. Nevertheless, the effect of taping remains disputed with contradictory results (Warme & Brooks, 2000;Josephsen et al, 2007;Woollings et al, 2015). Moreover, different exercises are proposed to strengthen the muscles, especially those of the fingers (e.g., practice of different hand grips in a nonweightbearing situation, clinging exercises; Williams et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%