Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China

Abstract

IntroductionThe Chinese New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) was launched in 2003 aiming at protecting the poor in rural areas from high health expenditures and improving access to health services. The income related inequality of the reform is a debating and concerning policy issue in China. The purpose of this study is to analyze the degree and changes of income related inequalities in both inpatient and outpatient services among NCMS enrollees from 2007 to 2011.Data and methodsData was extracted from the NCMS information system of Junan County in Shandong province from 2007 to 2011. The study targeted all NCMS enrollees in the county, 726850 registered in 2011. Detailed information included demographic data, inpatient and outpatient data in each year. Descriptive analysis of quintiles and standardized concentration index (CI*) were employed to examine the income related inequalities in both inpatient and outpatient care.ResultsFor inpatient care, the benefit rate CI* was positive (pro-rich) and increased from 2007 to 2011 while for outpatient care was negative (pro-poor) and a decreasing pattern was observed. For outpatient visits and expenses, the CI* changed from a positive sign in 2007 to a negative sign in 2011 with some fluctuations. The pro-rich inequality exacerbated for admissions while alleviated for length of stay and total inpatient expenses during the study period. The pro-rich inequality for inpatient reimbursement aggravated from 2007 to 2010 and alleviated from 2010 to 2011. For outpatient reimbursement, it altered from a positive sign in 2007 to a small negative sign in 2011. Finally, the richer needed to afford more self-payments for inpatient services and the CI* decreased from 2009 to 2011 while the inequality for outpatient self-payments changed from pro-rich in 2007 to pro-poor in 2011.ConclusionsIn the NCMS, the pro-rich inequality dominated for the inpatient care while a pro-poor advantage was shown for outpatient care from 2007 to 2011 in Junan. The extent of pro-rich inequality in length of stay, inpatient expenses and inpatient reimbursement increased from 2007 to 2009, but recently between 2010 and 2011 showed a change favoring the poor.

The effects of China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme on accessibility and affordability of healthcare services: an empirical research in Liaoning Province

“…Other studies have also proved that unmet healthcare needs and service avoidance were more prevalent in the lowest socio-economic status households than in the highest socio-economic status households [25, 26]. Our finding provided a hard evidence for the pro-rich inequality for inpatient service utilization proposed by Yuan et al [27]. …”

Study on the Utilization of Inpatient Services for Middle-Aged and Elderly Rural Females in Less Developed Regions of China

“…This is a new type of rural medical care and mutual aid system that is organized, guided, and supported by the government. The NRMC system collects funds through individual payment, collective support, and government subsidy with voluntary participation by farmers, and the overall goal is to better coordinate major diseases and reduce rural medical disasters [13,[20][21][22][23]. The NRMC started its pilot implementation in 2003 and the amount of funds raised in 2006 was 30 yuan in Jiangxi Province.…”

An evaluation of China’s new rural cooperative medical system: achievements and inadequacies from policy goals

“…Since the beginning of NRCMS, much public scrutiny and academic attention has focused on the evaluations of system implementation such as coverage rate, enrollee satisfaction, ratio of reimbursement, deductible, fund management and supervision, health care utilization, and medical expenses [ 14 – 17 ]. Several studies have also attempted to evaluate the effects of NRCMS on alleviating health-related poverty or financial protection [ 18 – 21 ]. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the achievements of the stated policy goals.…”