2015
DOI: 10.1177/0273475315589814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning

Abstract: Student engagement is an ongoing concern for educators because of its positive association with deep learning and educational outcomes. This article tests the use of a social networking site (Facebook) as a tool to facilitate asynchronous learning opportunities that complement face-to-face interactions and thereby enable a stronger learning ecosystem. This studentcentered learning approach offers a way to increase student engagement and can have a positive impact on academic outcomes. Using data from a longitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
174
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
174
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For ease, engagement behaviour will be referred to as "student participation" for the remainder of this paper. Research by Northey, Bucic, Chylinski, and Govind (2015) specifically focussed on the behavioural dimension, demonstrating that personal-level, behavioural engagement (effectively, participation in learning activities) is the key constituent that links to academic achievement, a concept supported by Morris, Finnegan, and Wu (2005). This is because related behaviours which go beyond involvement, such as effort, persistence and self-regulation, ultimately support cognitive engagement and this is likely to have a positive influence on academic outcomes such as final grades (Miller, Greene, Montalvo, Ravindran, & Nichols, 1996).…”
Section: Collaboration In a Blended Learning Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ease, engagement behaviour will be referred to as "student participation" for the remainder of this paper. Research by Northey, Bucic, Chylinski, and Govind (2015) specifically focussed on the behavioural dimension, demonstrating that personal-level, behavioural engagement (effectively, participation in learning activities) is the key constituent that links to academic achievement, a concept supported by Morris, Finnegan, and Wu (2005). This is because related behaviours which go beyond involvement, such as effort, persistence and self-regulation, ultimately support cognitive engagement and this is likely to have a positive influence on academic outcomes such as final grades (Miller, Greene, Montalvo, Ravindran, & Nichols, 1996).…”
Section: Collaboration In a Blended Learning Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive engagement is related to how much students invested cognitive efforts and resources in learning; the emotional one considered students' motivation and commitment; instead behavioral engagement deals with students on-task behaviors. [33].…”
Section: Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"In active learning, the processing of knowledge also requires a problem solving orientation, a critical approach and an evaluation of knowledge" [18] [ [17][18][19][20][21] Asynchronous learning "The use of the Internet to deliver anytime, anywhere" [22]. "In asynchronous settings, learning is self-paced, and users have access to previous activities contributed by others from the same group" [23].…”
Section: The Framework In Practice: Three Case Studies From Executivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [22][23][24][25] Blended learning "A learning program where more than one delivery mode is being used with the objective of optimizing the learning outcome and cost of program delivery" [26]. "The thoughtful integration of classroom face-to-face learning experiences with online learning experiences" [27].…”
Section: Eai Endorsed Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%