“…21,23,26,28Y30 Six studies were nonblinded and prospective with a small population, but included sufficient experimental details, proper diagnostic tests and diagnostic reference standards. 20,21,23,26,28,30 Of the 12 included studies, 6 had high 20,21,23,26,28,30 methodological quality, satisfying 55% or higher of the criteria for study quality and with an Oxford Evidence level of 2B. 11 However, 6 studies 19,22,24,25,27,29 were classified as level 3B because details of the patients, including age, were not reported and because they met lower than 50% of the quality criteria.…”