2013
DOI: 10.1021/ma302562v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indentation of Highly Charged PSPM Brushes Measured by Force Spectroscopy: Application of a Compressible Fluid Model

Abstract: Highly charged dense poly(sulfopropyl methacrylate) polyelectrolyte brushes were indented with an atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip as well as with an 8 μm silica colloidal probe at different ionic strengths ranging from Millipore water to 1 M NaCl. The force response during indentation was fitted to a phenomenological equation analogous to the equation of state of a compressible fluid. In this way, internal energy and brush thickness were obtained as a function of ionic strength. Long-range forces decayed exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such dependency is consistent with a mechanism whereby ‘grafting’ density of polymer chains changes with separation. This can be realized either for a polydisperse brush where density increases as the tip ventures deeper into the polymer layer, and starts to probe shorter chains, or through the lateral displacement of polymer molecules originating from the conical shape of an AFM tip that effectively wedges in between the chains ( Balastre et al , 2002 ; Bremmell et al , 2013 ; Cuellar et al , 2013 ). The presence of such a loose polymer layer is consistent with the fact that walls of L. multiflorum SCCs have a relatively low content of cellulose (<15%/dry weight), but are rich in MLG and arabinoxylan ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dependency is consistent with a mechanism whereby ‘grafting’ density of polymer chains changes with separation. This can be realized either for a polydisperse brush where density increases as the tip ventures deeper into the polymer layer, and starts to probe shorter chains, or through the lateral displacement of polymer molecules originating from the conical shape of an AFM tip that effectively wedges in between the chains ( Balastre et al , 2002 ; Bremmell et al , 2013 ; Cuellar et al , 2013 ). The presence of such a loose polymer layer is consistent with the fact that walls of L. multiflorum SCCs have a relatively low content of cellulose (<15%/dry weight), but are rich in MLG and arabinoxylan ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 There are several methods to study the mechanical properties of ultrathin polymer lms in the dry state; [11][12][13][14] however, there are currently few reports on the stiffness of thin, uniform polymer monolayers deposited on oxide nanoparticles and/or oxide nanober structures in the liquid state, which is likely rooted in the challenges associated with synthesizing conformal, uniform monolayer lms and the difficulties in accurately quantifying the mechanical properties at the nanometer scale at the same time. [15][16][17][18] Many theories have been proposed to explain the interaction forces involved in nanometer thickness polymer deformations. [19][20][21][22][23][24] For example, Spencer et al reported on the absorption of a copolymer consisting of PEG chains graed on the poly(L-lysine) backbone on niobium oxide substrates, and studied the mechanical properties of different PEG graing densities via colloid-probe atomic force microscopy (AFM) under varying ionic strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among repulsion forces exerted between colloids, that of steric hindrance by polymer brushes has raised interest in the field of AFM force spectroscopy. Mathematical models were developed for the indentation of a polymer brush by a conical or a colloidal AFM tip (Cuellar, Llarena, Moya, & Donath, 2013). A reference force curve is measured onto a bare spot of the sample, made by locally scratching and clearing the polymer brush with the AFM tip, to get to the contact point.…”
Section: Steric Repulsion By a Polymer Brushmentioning
confidence: 99%