2016
DOI: 10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Índices contábeis e a decisão do pagamento de dividendos

Abstract: Os índices contábeis servem de medida dos diversos aspectos econômicos e financeiros das empresas. Por meio deles, a presente pesquisa busca identificar quais aspectos são relevantes para a distribuição de dividendos no Brasil, considerando conjuntamente os diversos aspectos legais pertinentes. Verificou-se, através de uma regressão logística, que alguns são estatisticamente significantes para este objetivo: ROE, liquidez, tamanho, investimento, instabilidade da receita e estabilidade da política de dividendos. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is a dummy variable, the minimum and maximum values were 0 and 1, respectively. After winsorizing process, as far as payout is concerned, the average observed was 2.130, with a standard deviation of 0.766, a result close to that observed by Vancin and Procianoy (2016), who studied the relevant aspects for dividend distribution in Brazil between 2007 and 2013. The average DY was 2.00, with a standard deviation of 4.688, a higher result than that documented by Pinto (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Since it is a dummy variable, the minimum and maximum values were 0 and 1, respectively. After winsorizing process, as far as payout is concerned, the average observed was 2.130, with a standard deviation of 0.766, a result close to that observed by Vancin and Procianoy (2016), who studied the relevant aspects for dividend distribution in Brazil between 2007 and 2013. The average DY was 2.00, with a standard deviation of 4.688, a higher result than that documented by Pinto (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This result is in line with Zhang's (2018) and Forti et al (2015), who deem the performance and asset size variables responsible for the distribution of dividends. In the study by Vancin and Procianoy (2016a), the determinant variables of dividend were income instability and asset growth; both had a negative relationship with dividends and ROE and company size, which were positively linked to shareholder remuneration. The results found here diverge from the literature in the fact that asset growth presents a positive and significant coefficient for both specifications, which is counterintuitive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Companies with high levels of investment are usually required to retain their profits to finance such investments without changing debt levels (Forti et al, 2015). Companies with revenue irregularities are likely to be less committed to paying dividends (Vancin & Procianoy, 2016a, 2016b; to capture this effect, we used the variable revenue instability. When increasing assets, companies need resources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations