2017
DOI: 10.2192/ursu-d-16-00028.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect effects of bear hunting: a review from Scandinavia

Abstract: Harvest by means of hunting is a commonly used tool in large carnivore management. To evaluate the effects of harvest on populations, managers usually focus on numerical or immediate direct demographic effects of harvest mortality on a population's size and growth. However, we suggest that managers should also give consideration to indirect and potential evolutionary effects of hunting, e.g., the consequences of a change in the age, sex, and social structure, and their effects on population growth rate. We def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown bear hunting in Sweden has known impacts beyond the initial offtake of direct mortality, such as altering life history traits (Bischof et al, 2017;Frank et al, 2017) or inducing an increase in sexually-selected infanticide through an increased male turnover (Swenson et al, 1997). Furthermore, adult bears that would naturally face low mortality rates (Bischof and Zedrosser, 2009;Bischof et al, , 2017 adopt antipredator behaviors in response to human hunting pressure (Ordiz et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown bear hunting in Sweden has known impacts beyond the initial offtake of direct mortality, such as altering life history traits (Bischof et al, 2017;Frank et al, 2017) or inducing an increase in sexually-selected infanticide through an increased male turnover (Swenson et al, 1997). Furthermore, adult bears that would naturally face low mortality rates (Bischof and Zedrosser, 2009;Bischof et al, , 2017 adopt antipredator behaviors in response to human hunting pressure (Ordiz et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may increase the probability of encounters between unfamiliar individuals leading to elevated rates of conflict, sexually selected infanticide, and increased local extinction risk (Creel et al, , ; Gosselin, Zedrosser, Swenson, & Pelletier, ; Whitman, Starfield, Quadling, & Packer, ). Moreover, directed harvest toward a specific sex, age, or size cohort disrupts dispersal patterns (Frank, Ordiz, et al, ; Milner, Nilsen, & Andreassen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geisser & Reyer, ; Teichman, Cristescu, & Darimont, ). Altogether, our results underscore the need to better understand the short‐ and long‐term indirect effects of hunting on animal social structure and their resulting distribution in space, which, if not understood, could have unforeseen consequences on population parameters such as fitness and population growth (Frank et al., in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%