Cadaver decomposition islands around animal carcasses can facilitate establishment of various plant life. Facultative scavengers have great potential for endozoochory, and often aggregate around carcasses. Hence, they may disperse plant seeds that they ingest across the landscape towards cadaver decomposition islands. Here, we demonstrate this novel mechanism along a gradient of wild tundra reindeer carcasses. First, we show that the spatial distribution of scavenger faeces (birds and foxes) was concentrated around carcasses. Second, faeces of the predominant scavengers (corvids) commonly contained viable seeds of crowberry, a keystone species of the alpine tundra with predominantly vegetative reproduction. We suggest that cadaver decomposition islands function as endpoints for directed endozoochory by scavengers. Such a mechanism could be especially beneficial for species that rely on small-scale disturbances in soil and vegetation, such as several Nordic berry-producing species with cryptic generative reproduction.
BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.
Territoriality is an important process shaping population dynamics, and the defence of a territory is crucial for individuals to increase the duration of territory occupancy and, consequently, reproductive success. However, little is known about how the frequency of territory intrusions and subsequent territorial behaviours and aggression by territory owners are affected by external factors, such as population density. This is important because it can affect mate change (the replacement of one pair member) and dispersal, a key ecological process. The aim of this study was to investigate the behavioural and spatial response of territory owners to intruder pressure as a function of population density in a territorial, monogamous mammal, the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber). Using a combination of GPS technology, scent experiments, camera trap data and tail scar observations from an individual‐based long‐term study, we investigated the factors influencing spatial movement patterns by territory owners in response to a simulated intruder and the factors affecting territory intrusions. We found consistent inverse density‐dependent patterns in territorial behaviours and evidence of conspecific aggression. At lower densities, territory owners detected more simulated intrusions, showed more territorial reactions and experienced increased conspecific aggression as indicated by tail scars, suggesting increased intruder pressure. Inverse density‐dependent territorial behaviour and aggression suggest a potential mechanistic link between inverse density‐dependent natal dispersal and mate change. At low population densities, increased dispersal amplifies intruder pressure, leading to the observed increases in territorial behaviours, conspecific aggression and previously observed mate turnover, which in turn might increase natal dispersal. Our study demonstrates how population density can affect the behaviour and space use of individuals, which is important for territory occupancy and fitness.
Harvest by means of hunting is a commonly used tool in large carnivore management. To evaluate the effects of harvest on populations, managers usually focus on numerical or immediate direct demographic effects of harvest mortality on a population's size and growth. However, we suggest that managers should also give consideration to indirect and potential evolutionary effects of hunting, e.g., the consequences of a change in the age, sex, and social structure, and their effects on population growth rate. We define "indirect effects" as hunting-induced changes in a population, including human-induced selection, that result in an additive change to the population growth rate "lambda" beyond that due to the initial offtake from direct mortality. We considered four major sources of possible indirect effects from hunting of bears; 1) changes to a population's age and sex structure, 2) changes to a population's social structure, 3) changes in individual behavior, and 4) human-induced selection. We identified empirically supported, as well as expected, indirect effects of hunting, based primarily on > 30 years of research on the Scandinavian brown bear population. We stress that some indirect effects have been documented, e.g., habitat use and daily activity patterns of bears change when hunting seasons start and changes in male social structure induces sexually-selected infanticide and reduces population growth. Other effects may be more difficult to document and quantify in wild bear populations, e.g., how a younger age structure in males may lead to decreased offspring survival. We suggest that managers of bear and other large carnivore populations apply the cautionary principle and assume that indirect effects do exist, have a potential impact on population structure, and, ultimately, may have an effect on population growth that differs from that predicted by harvest models based on direct effects alone.
Harvest can affect the ecology and evolution of wild species. The removal of key individuals, such as matriarchs or dominant males, can disrupt social structure and exacerbate the impact of hunting on population growth. We do not know, however, how and when the spatiotemporal reorganization takes place after removal and if such changes can be the mechanism that explain a decrease in population growth. Detailed behavioral information from individually monitored brown bears, in a population where hunting increases sexually selected infanticide, revealed that adult males increased their use of home ranges of hunter-killed neighbors in the second year after their death. Use of a hunter-killed male’s home range was influenced by the survivor’s as well as the hunter-killed male’s age, population density, and hunting intensity. Our results emphasize that hunting can have long-term indirect effects which can affect population viability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.