2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.g000531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect Optimization of Finite-Thrust Cooperative Rendezvous

Abstract: A time-constrained finite-thrust rendezvous between two cooperating spacecraft is investigated in detail in this paper. To ensure high numerical accuracy, the optimization is carried out by means of an indirect method that exploits an “a priori” subdivision of the trajectory into burn and coast arcs, whose time lengths become additional\ud unknown parameters. Issues related to simultaneous presence of two switching control structures, one for each maneuvering spacecraft, are analyzed. A peculiar approach, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section presents an analytical, suboptimal, four-impulse transfer strategy that gives, in a short computational time, a conservative estimate of the optimal ΔV for a planar, time-fixed, impulsive rendezvous between circular orbits. When the allowed travel time is sufficiently large, this strategy fairly approximates the performance of the optimal solution [44]. Furthermore, with respect to other heuristics adopted in similar studies [45], the proposed approach represents a real, feasible, mission scheme.…”
Section: Two-level Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This section presents an analytical, suboptimal, four-impulse transfer strategy that gives, in a short computational time, a conservative estimate of the optimal ΔV for a planar, time-fixed, impulsive rendezvous between circular orbits. When the allowed travel time is sufficiently large, this strategy fairly approximates the performance of the optimal solution [44]. Furthermore, with respect to other heuristics adopted in similar studies [45], the proposed approach represents a real, feasible, mission scheme.…”
Section: Two-level Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This section presents an analytical, sub-optimal, four-impulse strategy to assess the ∆V of a trajectory leg, for any assigned pair of departure and arrival bodies that fly on circular orbits, which fairly approximates the behavior of the time-fixed optimal solution, 23,24 when the allowed travel time is sufficiently large. Assuming that departure and arrival orbits are not too far apart, the minimum-∆V solution is represented by a Hohmann transfer, possibly preceded and/or followed by coasting arcs on the departure and/or arrival orbit which allow for the correct phasing required by this kind of maneuver.…”
Section: Cost Estimate For a Single Rendezvous Legmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both indirect and direct methods have been proposed for the solution of the minimum-fuel finitethrust time-constrained rendezvous problem. 1,2 Indirect methods 3 are characterized by a high numerical accuracy and require a small computational effort. However, the optimal mission structure, i.e., the sequence of burn and coast arcs, is usually unknown, and this poses a severe challenge on the capability of indirect methods to routinely, rapidly, and automatically solve the problem at hand 4 (partially mitigated by the ongoing development of control regularization and continuation techniques).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show the effectiveness of the approach, numerical results for several cases are presented and compared with the solutions provided by an indirect method. 2 In particular, the solver capability of finding the best solution in the presence of different families of optimal solutions, as detected by the indirect method, is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%