2020
DOI: 10.3390/e22080829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indistinguishability and Negative Probabilities

Abstract: In this paper, we examined the connection between quantum systems’ indistinguishability and signed (or negative) probabilities. We do so by first introducing a measure-theoretic definition of signed probabilities inspired by research in quantum contextuality. We then argue that ontological indistinguishability leads to the no-signaling condition and negative probabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, negative probabilities have been explored in various quantum mechanical contexts, such as indistiguishability [24], quantum computation [25], and contextuality [26]. Besides, an operational interpretation of negative probabilities has been proposed by Abramsky and Brandenburger [27,28].…”
Section: Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, negative probabilities have been explored in various quantum mechanical contexts, such as indistiguishability [24], quantum computation [25], and contextuality [26]. Besides, an operational interpretation of negative probabilities has been proposed by Abramsky and Brandenburger [27,28].…”
Section: Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, extended probability is related with contextuality. The difference between the total sum of the probability's modulus and 1 (which is, of course, the total sum in classical probability) defines a coefficient of contextuality [24,25]. Other alternative "quasi-Boolean" descriptions of Bell's experiment involve probabilities defined over singular measures [26] or non-measurable sets [27], or p-adic ultrametric distances [28][29][30].…”
Section: Is It Always Impossible Applying Probabilities To Non-boolea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random variables with the same content (but belonging to different contexts) are made equal without further discussion. In a recent series of works [ 58 , 61 , 62 ], it was proposed that repeated experiments are neither equal nor different. They are considered indistinguishable , the latter being a notion taken from non-reflexive logic.…”
Section: The Main Features Of Quantum Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%