2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05622-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict motor-inhibitory performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, intervention attempts designed to improve local and/or long-distance connectivity strength with the right insula may strengthen inhibition in SSD. SICI is important as it was associated with other inhibitory tasks such as Go-No-Go and Stop-Signal task performance in healthy subjects ( He et al, 2019 ), and processing speed performance in SSD ( Du et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, intervention attempts designed to improve local and/or long-distance connectivity strength with the right insula may strengthen inhibition in SSD. SICI is important as it was associated with other inhibitory tasks such as Go-No-Go and Stop-Signal task performance in healthy subjects ( He et al, 2019 ), and processing speed performance in SSD ( Du et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the relationship between ongoing corticospinal brain activity and behavioral motor functioning has been extensively investigated (Duque et al 2017). Recently, quite a few studies (Chowdhury et al 2018, 2019a, 2019b, 2020a, 2020b; He et al 2019; Hermans et al 2019) have investigated the relationship between offline TMS-derived GABAergic inhibitory biomarkers (resting-state SICI, LICI) and behavioral motor-inhibitory efficiency. In particular, in their study Chowdhury and Colleagues (2018) showed for the first time a negative correlation between individual GABA A ergic intracortical motor inhibition (measured via SICI’s amplitude) and SSRT’s length, indicating that subjects with stronger resting state SICI tend to be faster at inhibiting their responses, and so better at action stopping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether individual differences in these neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition might be related to actual behavioral individual differences in inhibitory control efficiency (Chowdhury et al 2017; He et al 2019). Recently quite a few studies (Chowdhury et al 2018, 2019a, 2019b, 2020a, 2020b; He et al 2019; Hermans et al 2019) have investigated whether and to what extent individual levels of resting-state SICI and LICI measured offline might reflect individual differences in the efficiency of the inhibitory processes, indexed by the length of the SSRT. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that trait-like interindividual differences the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition (and SICI in particular) can predict individual’s actual behavioral motor inhibition capacities (Chowdhury et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ARI task was originally developed by Slater-Hammel in 1960 17 and was later implemented by Stinear & Byblow to assess the neurophysiology of Focal Hand Dystonia 5 . ARI tasks have become increasingly popular, especially in studies where it is used concomitantly with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Unlike choice-reaction stop-signal tasks, ARI tasks do not require participants to make choice responses on go trials, but instead require them to make an anticipated response in order to stop a moving indicator (typically a vertically filling bar) at a predefined stationary target (See Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%