2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor–outdoor behavior and sources of size-resolved airborne particles in French classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean CO 2 concentrations were much higher in indoor than outdoor air and the daily limitation of 1000 ppm based on IAQS. The mean concentration of CO 2 (1319 ppm) was higher in the spring hotels than some indoor microenvironments, like schools (502 ppm [4]; 1216 ppm [23]). The concentration of CO 2 was more strongly related to the respiration of the people inside the rooms rather than the intrusion of CO 2 from outdoor air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean CO 2 concentrations were much higher in indoor than outdoor air and the daily limitation of 1000 ppm based on IAQS. The mean concentration of CO 2 (1319 ppm) was higher in the spring hotels than some indoor microenvironments, like schools (502 ppm [4]; 1216 ppm [23]). The concentration of CO 2 was more strongly related to the respiration of the people inside the rooms rather than the intrusion of CO 2 from outdoor air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geller et al (2002) points out that activities such as vacuum cleaning, sweeping, dusting furniture and washing carpets account for 50-80% of the particles in a 2-10 µm range in indoor environments. While the contribution of outdoor particles at this size range varies between 10 and 40% and usually decreases as the diameter increases (TRAN et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Classroom IAQ comprises a wide range of parameters, and although international guidelines have not been defined for classroom IAQ, an international effort has begun to characterize these microenvironments (Annesi-Maesano et al, 2013;Chatzidiakou et al, 2012). Several studies have monitored indoor air concentrations of gaseous compounds (Stranger et al, 2007), particles (Branis et al, 2005;Fromme et al, 2007Fromme et al, , 2008Tran et al, 2012Tran et al, , 2014, semi-volatile organic compounds (Lim et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2010), and allergens (Salo et al, 2009). Other studies have investigated outdoor air contributions Blondeau et al, 2005;Madureira et al, 2012), the role of different ventilation strategies (Geelen et al, 2008;Guo et al, 2008;Rosbach et al, 2013;Santamouris et al, 2008) and the relationships with student health (Daisey et al, 2003;Mendell et al, 2013;Simoni et al, 2011) and performance (Bak o-Bir o et al, 2012;Haverinen-Shaughnessy et al, 2011;Shendell et al, 2004;Twardella et al, 2012;Wargocki and Wyon, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Chatzidiakou et al (2015) studied the relationship between CO 2 , ventilation rates (VRs), and selected pollutants in 18 classrooms from six schools in London. In France, some studies have been conducted in schools but only in limited numbers (Annesi-Maesano et al, 2012;Blondeau et al, 2005;Poupard et al, 2005;Tran et al, 2014) or only for a limited number of indoor air pollutants (Michelot et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%