1955
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.98.1216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic Collision Cross Sections at 1.0-, 4.0-, and 4.5-Mev Neutron Energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the predicted compound nucleus formation is smaller than that required to match the experimental inelastic collision cross sections. 7 Consequently, limit (1) predicted by the model is too high, causing the experimental data to fall systematically below it. Also the energy at which the experiments start to deviate from limit (1) will thus be too high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the predicted compound nucleus formation is smaller than that required to match the experimental inelastic collision cross sections. 7 Consequently, limit (1) predicted by the model is too high, causing the experimental data to fall systematically below it. Also the energy at which the experiments start to deviate from limit (1) will thus be too high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is in agreement with the conclusion reached independently by comparison with inelastic collision cross sections in the 4-Mev range. 7 The method described here serves, therefore, to estimate the amount of compound elastic scattering. It is also possible in some cases to indicate certain deficiencies in a given nuclear model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 with that calculated from statistical theory. The points are the measured results of various workers 18 ' [38][39][40] and the curve gives the calculated cross section using final states and opticalmodel jparameters as listed in Tables III and IV. The agreement confirms the Al 27 +^ transmission functions used in the theoretical calculations.…”
Section: The Neutron-nonelastic Cross Section Of Al 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little effort has been made in the past to differentiate between items (3) and (4), and since all of the individual reactions produce two neutrons (the decay of every Be 9 level leads eventually to a neutron and two a particles), the cross sections have generally been collected in the all-inclusive symbol a 2 nAlthough it is obviously a difficult experimental problem to disentangle all of these neutron-producing reactions, it would be of considerable interest to know at least something about the relative cross sections. In addition to the reporting of measurements of the nonelastic cross sections, it is one of the purposes of this paper to draw some conclusions about these latter contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%