Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems IX 2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.875774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial microfluidics for continuous separation of cells and particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major challenge of utilizing a spiral microchannel in blood cell separation lies in the limited separation resolution and capacity of holding a vast number of RBCs without affecting the separation efficiency. One recent work showed that polystyrene particles with a diameter of 7.32, 9.92, 15.02, and 20.66 μm, respectively, could focus into four distinct bands in a spiral microchannel with 500 μm × 100 μm ( W × H ) rectangular cross-section at De = 16.3, at a very low concentration (0.005% volume fraction particle solution) . However, this design cannot be directly applied to a blood sample where the vast number of RBCs significantly broaden the stream width of RBCs due to cell–cell interactions and affect the focusing of other cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major challenge of utilizing a spiral microchannel in blood cell separation lies in the limited separation resolution and capacity of holding a vast number of RBCs without affecting the separation efficiency. One recent work showed that polystyrene particles with a diameter of 7.32, 9.92, 15.02, and 20.66 μm, respectively, could focus into four distinct bands in a spiral microchannel with 500 μm × 100 μm ( W × H ) rectangular cross-section at De = 16.3, at a very low concentration (0.005% volume fraction particle solution) . However, this design cannot be directly applied to a blood sample where the vast number of RBCs significantly broaden the stream width of RBCs due to cell–cell interactions and affect the focusing of other cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For equilibrium separation, the performance of cell sorters mainly relies on the accurate focusing of both targeted and nontargeted cells at distinct locations in the curvilinear microchannels. Separation into 3 different particle sizes (10, 15, and 20 μm) (56) and separation into 4 different sizes (7.32, 9.92, 15.02, and 20.66 μm) (57) have been reported to have high efficiency (90%) using spiral microchannels with strategically placed outlets. In one study, Lee et al (58) employed a spiral system with multiple outlets to synchronize mammalian cultures and reported relatively high efficiency and throughput (approximately 15 × 10 6 cells/h).…”
Section: Inertial Separation (Operation At Moderate Reynolds Numbers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For equilibrium separation, the performance of cell sorters mainly relies on the accurate focusing of both targeted and nontargeted cells at distinct locations in the curvilinear microchannels. Separation into 3 different particle sizes (10, 15, and 20 µm) (56) and separation into 4 different sizes (7.32, 9.92, 15.02, and 20.66 µm) (57) have been reported to have high efficiency (90%) using spiral microchannels with strategically placed outlets. In one study, Lee et al ( 58) employed a spiral system with multiple outlets to synchronize mammalian cultures and reported relatively high efficiency and throughput (approximately 15 × 10 6 cells/h).…”
Section: Inner Outlet Collection Sample Inmentioning
confidence: 99%