InfAcrOnt: calculating cross-ontology term similarities using information flow by a random walk

Abstract

BackgroundSince the establishment of the first biomedical ontology Gene Ontology (GO), the number of biomedical ontology has increased dramatically. Nowadays over 300 ontologies have been built including extensively used Disease Ontology (DO) and Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). Because of the advantage of identifying novel relationships between terms, calculating similarity between ontology terms is one of the major tasks in this research area. Though similarities between terms within each ontology have been studied with in silico methods, term similarities across different ontologies were not investigated as deeply. The latest method took advantage of gene functional interaction network (GFIN) to explore such inter-ontology similarities of terms. However, it only used gene interactions and failed to make full use of the connectivity among gene nodes of the network. In addition, all existent methods are particularly designed for GO and their performances on the extended ontology community remain unknown.ResultsWe proposed a method InfAcrOnt to infer similarities between terms across ontologies utilizing the entire GFIN. InfAcrOnt builds a term-gene-gene network which comprised ontology annotations and GFIN, and acquires similarities between terms across ontologies through modeling the information flow within the network by random walk. In our benchmark experiments on sub-ontologies of GO, InfAcrOnt achieves a high average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.9322 and 0.9309) and low standard deviations (1.8746e-6 and 3.0977e-6) in both human and yeast benchmark datasets exhibiting superior performance. Meanwhile, comparisons of InfAcrOnt results and prior knowledge on pair-wise DO-HPO terms and pair-wise DO-GO terms show high correlations.ConclusionsThe experiment results show that InfAcrOnt significantly improves the performance of inferring similarities between terms across ontologies in benchmark set.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4338-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

eQTLMAPT: Fast and Accurate eQTL Mediation Analysis With Efficient Permutation Testing Approaches

“…Further computational methods and biological experiments are still needed to understand these unknown markers, such as using phynotypes, ontologies, deep learning methods, etc. (Cheng et al, 2016;Cheng et al, 2018c;Peng et al, 2019c;Peng et al, 2019d). In addition, since the gene expression is tissue-specific and cell type-specific, the mediation effects found in brain tissue might not show up in other tissues and cell types.…”

GANsDTA: Predicting Drug-Target Binding Affinity Using GANs

“…On the contrary, SimBoost utilizes a gradient boosting machine and belongs to feature-based methods; its feature involves similarity matrices of the drugs and those of targets He et al (2017). The similarity-based methods (Cheng et al, 2018b) generally rely on similarities to predict the interaction of DT, which inevitably leads to bias. For the feature-based methods, more information regarding the DT are involved; but expert knowledge and feature engineering are also required to construct appropriate features.…”

6mA-RicePred: A Method for Identifying DNA N6-Methyladenine Sites in the Rice Genome Based on Feature Fusion

“…Regarding dimensionality reduction algorithms, MRMD (Zou et al, 2016a) performs well and is an excellent feature selection algorithm. Other highly efficient feature selection algorithms have been proposed in bioinformatics classification (Zou et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Cheng et al, 2018a;Zhu et al, 2018a;Cheng et al, 2018b;Zhu et al, 2018b;Lai et al, 2019;Dao et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2019;Ren Qi et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2019b). Regarding classification algorithms, an increasing number of classification methods are being used by researchers to identify 6mA sites, such as Random Forest, XGboost, support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT).…”