2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infants as costly social tools in male Barbary macaque networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental manipulations, including the actual or simulated removal of individuals (Hanby 1980; Chapais et al 1995; Flack et al 2006; Williams and Lusseau 2006; Lehmann and Dunbar 2009), adjustments to sex ratios (Darden et al 2009; Jacoby et al 2010), and alterations in the amount of time individuals have been housed together (Corner et al 2003), have been found to result in changes to social structure topology. Similar changes in naturalistic settings have been demonstrated in relation to changes in ecological factors, such as food abundance (Henkel et al 2010; Foster et al 2012), to changes over time (Sade 1965; Ramos-Fernández et al 2009), as well as to changes in demographic factors, such as the birth of infants (Seyfarth 1977; Hanby 1980), or large changes in group size (Lehmann and Boesch 2009). Changes in social structure topology in relation to large changes in group size may not be surprising as this type of demographic shift considerably alters the number of possible dyadic partnerships, which is likely to be translated directly into changes in social structure topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Experimental manipulations, including the actual or simulated removal of individuals (Hanby 1980; Chapais et al 1995; Flack et al 2006; Williams and Lusseau 2006; Lehmann and Dunbar 2009), adjustments to sex ratios (Darden et al 2009; Jacoby et al 2010), and alterations in the amount of time individuals have been housed together (Corner et al 2003), have been found to result in changes to social structure topology. Similar changes in naturalistic settings have been demonstrated in relation to changes in ecological factors, such as food abundance (Henkel et al 2010; Foster et al 2012), to changes over time (Sade 1965; Ramos-Fernández et al 2009), as well as to changes in demographic factors, such as the birth of infants (Seyfarth 1977; Hanby 1980), or large changes in group size (Lehmann and Boesch 2009). Changes in social structure topology in relation to large changes in group size may not be surprising as this type of demographic shift considerably alters the number of possible dyadic partnerships, which is likely to be translated directly into changes in social structure topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Note that in this species, females maintain close bonds with both related and unrelated females [11], and males interact with infants remarkably frequently [12]. The close friend was defined as the female in the group with which a subject exchanged most affiliative interactions during group scans, whereas the non-friend was a female with whom no affiliative interactions were recorded.…”
Section: Social Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to philopatric female baboons and male chimpanzees (38,40,41) macaque males of some species, including Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus), form strong social relationships with a few male partners (35,36,39,42) that are stable over consecutive years and characterized by equitability in exchanges of affiliation (37). The mechanisms guiding partner selection for the formation of social bonds in male macaques are currently unknown.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%