2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.10.011
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory biomarkers in patients in Simvastatin treatment: No effect of co-enzyme Q10 supplementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Admittedly, the sample size for this experiment is very small (N = 7 Simvastatin users with myalgia); therefore, it remains possible that a beneficial effect of UQ on myalgia could be observed in a future study on a larger patient cohort. Nevertheless, other studies generally agree with our findings, indicating limited benefit of UQ towards SAM 38,52 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Admittedly, the sample size for this experiment is very small (N = 7 Simvastatin users with myalgia); therefore, it remains possible that a beneficial effect of UQ on myalgia could be observed in a future study on a larger patient cohort. Nevertheless, other studies generally agree with our findings, indicating limited benefit of UQ towards SAM 38,52 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a previous study on the same cohort, we demonstrated a five-fold increase in serum levels of UQ 51 . However, here we report that mitochondrial respiration and the abundance of superoxide in blood cells were similar in Simvastatin users dosed with UQ or placebo for 8 weeks independent of the presence or absence of SAM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations