1979
DOI: 10.2527/jas1979.491128x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a Sub-Therapeutic Level of Virginiamycin in Feed on the Incidence and Persistence of Salmonella typhimurium in Experimentally Infected Swine1

Abstract: Swine were infected with Salmonella typhimurium, USDA #295, and treated with virginiamycin medicated feed continuously at a level of 55 g/metric ton for approximately 2 months. The incidence and persistence of shedding of this organism in the feces and in selected tissues were determined. No significant changes in the course of the infection were detected when virginiamycin treated animals were compared to nonmedicated infected controls. (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research regarding Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance subsequent to antimicrobial therapy has been conducted in laboratory facilities involving experimental infection with S. enterica. 1,4,9,10,16,18,21,23,26,27,38,53,54 This may not represent the typical subclinical Salmonella infections on swine farms, which often involve multiple serovars and variable time and dose of Salmonella exposure. 20,29 There are limited observational investigations that evaluated the impact of antimicrobial use on the antimicrobial resistance profiles between farms.…”
Section: Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline and Salmonellamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous research regarding Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance subsequent to antimicrobial therapy has been conducted in laboratory facilities involving experimental infection with S. enterica. 1,4,9,10,16,18,21,23,26,27,38,53,54 This may not represent the typical subclinical Salmonella infections on swine farms, which often involve multiple serovars and variable time and dose of Salmonella exposure. 20,29 There are limited observational investigations that evaluated the impact of antimicrobial use on the antimicrobial resistance profiles between farms.…”
Section: Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline and Salmonellamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Few on-farm clinical trials evaluating the effect of subtherapeutic antimicrobials on SE prevalence have been conducted. Previous research regarding SE shedding and antimicrobial resistance subsequent to antimicrobial therapy have been conducted in laboratory facilities involving experimental infection with S. enterica (Abou-Youssef et al, 1979;Baggesen et al, 1999;Dealy and Moeller, 1976;Delsol et al, 2003;Ebner and Mathew, 2000;Evangelisti et al, 1975;Girard et al, 1976;Gutzmann et al, 1976;Jacks et al, 1988;Jones et al, 1983;Mathew et al, 2002;Wilcock and Olander, 1978;Williams et al, 1978). The goal of this study is to determine the effect of stringent cleaning and the use of subtherapeutic CTC on the prevalence of SE in market ready swine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to control the gut microbiota, antibiotic use has become a routine procedure for treating both humans [4] and livestock [5]. Studies have shown that antibiotic treatment of chickens, cattle and swine reduces Salmonella and E. coli infection [6,7,8,9,10]. However, antibiotics have been shown to increase Proteobacteria, a phylum which contains a large number of pathogenic bacteria [11,12,13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%