2016
DOI: 10.5958/2348-7542.2016.00085.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bunch covers on appearance and maturity of banana cv. Jahaji under high density planting system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations agreed with previous reports that investigated application of ALF material on Cavendish banana during summer and winter [4,22]. Temperature rise within the cover material was partly caused by the increase in layering [6]. In the winter trial, WPNW (2 layers) and multilayer (4 layers) with PS sheet in the control treatment exhibited the highest maximum temperatures (Figures 3A and 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These observations agreed with previous reports that investigated application of ALF material on Cavendish banana during summer and winter [4,22]. Temperature rise within the cover material was partly caused by the increase in layering [6]. In the winter trial, WPNW (2 layers) and multilayer (4 layers) with PS sheet in the control treatment exhibited the highest maximum temperatures (Figures 3A and 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, all five treatments (in both trials) did not significantly affect pulp-to-peel ratio (Figure 5). This result concurred with previous studies on different material covers, where perforated blue PE, NW, and ALF bunch cover materials did not significantly increase pulp-to-peel ratios of William, Jahaji and Cavendish banana, respectively [2,6,7]. A recent study conducted on Cavendish banana during the winter season also found that perforated blue PE and NW did not significantly affect pulp-to-peel ratio [4,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation