2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cyber-attacks on longitudinal safety of connected and automated vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many kinds of cyber-attack such as denial of service (DoS), interference attack, false data injection attack and so on [21][22][23]. In this section we consider the false data injection attack.…”
Section: False Data Injection Attack Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many kinds of cyber-attack such as denial of service (DoS), interference attack, false data injection attack and so on [21][22][23]. In this section we consider the false data injection attack.…”
Section: False Data Injection Attack Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that fading channels degrade the performance of CACC systems through rich simulation experiments under various attacked scenarios. In addition, Li et al [23] summerized the influences of cyber-attacks on longitudinal safety of connected and automated vehicles via extensive simulations and sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study by Li et al (2018) investigated the effects of slight cyber-attack on longitudinal safety of AVs. They noted that connectivity features of AVs increase the susceptibility to cyber-attack.…”
Section: Potential Effects Of Avs On Safety and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the stopping distance of the front vehicle is larger than the following vehicle, it is safe; otherwise, it is dangerous. Figure 2(b) illustrates the safe stopping distance and the RCRI can be derived as [53]. Besides conflict angle, rear-end collision risk index (RCRI) is another surrogate measure for rear-end collision, which is defined as the ratio of the number of unsafe car-following events.…”
Section: Surrogate Safety Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the stopping distance of the front vehicle is larger than the following vehicle, it is safe; otherwise, it is dangerous. Figure 2b illustrates the safe stopping distance and the RCRI can be derived as [53].…”
Section: Surrogate Safety Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%