2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/1823189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Dental Restorations on Oxidative Stress in Gingival Crevicular Fluid

Abstract: Biocompatibility of dental materials (DM) can be evaluated by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) oxidative stress (OS) status. The goal of the study was to ascertain influence of dental caries degree, teeth position, and type and amount of applied DM on GCF OS profile. For this purpose, we tested six DMs that were sealed in one session: amalgam (Amg), composites: Tetric EvoCeram and Beautifil (BF), phosphate cement—zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cements—zinc polycarboxylate cements, and glass ionomer cement (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, locally produced IL-1β and TNF-α exert significant influence on odontoblasts functions, inducing further β-defensin production 22 , production of dental matrix protein -1 and inducing proliferation of odontoblast-like cells derived from stem cells. 23 Moreover, the studies investigated the cytokine profile in the GCF samples following dental restoration and reported controversial data 24,25,26,27,28,29,30 The hypothesis of the present study was that IL-1β and TNF-α profile in the GCF from caries affected and intact teeth are different, while the caries extension, tooth position, and different restorative biomaterials alters the biomarker profile as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, locally produced IL-1β and TNF-α exert significant influence on odontoblasts functions, inducing further β-defensin production 22 , production of dental matrix protein -1 and inducing proliferation of odontoblast-like cells derived from stem cells. 23 Moreover, the studies investigated the cytokine profile in the GCF samples following dental restoration and reported controversial data 24,25,26,27,28,29,30 The hypothesis of the present study was that IL-1β and TNF-α profile in the GCF from caries affected and intact teeth are different, while the caries extension, tooth position, and different restorative biomaterials alters the biomarker profile as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Since there were no clinical signs of any inflammatory process or plaque accumulation after restoration either in our or previous studies 29,25,26 inflammatory mediator increase could be attributed to a healing or reparation process. Calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are known to stimulate dentinogenesis and cementogenesis, together with early inflammation 79 , while MTA, at least in vitro, demonstrated significant IL-1β stimulating capacity 80 Hydroxyl ions derived from these restorative materials change oxido/reductive balance at lesion site 28 , ultimately inducing chemical tissue irritation and cellular necrosis. Necrotic cells release low levels of cytokines and other damage signals to facilitate the removal of the dead or dying cells, leading to a inflammation without microorganisms in lesion itself 81,82 So, the significant presence of inflammatory mediators in GCF of restored teeth without signs of the inflammatory process could be associated with the reparative process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the day of the assays, saliva and GCF were slowly thawed at 4 • C. For GCF extraction, PerioPaper Strips ® (Oraflow, New York, NY, USA) were placed in Eppendorf ® (Eppendorf, Warszawa, Polska) tubes containing 0.02 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (1 strip/500 µL PBS pH 7.0). The samples were mixed for 30 s in a vortex mixer and then centrifuged (4 • C, 3000× g, 5 min) [12,28].…”
Section: Redox Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the day of determining, the samples containing saliva and gingival crevicular fluid were slowly thawed at 4 • C. In order to extract gingival crevicular fluid, PerioPaper Strips ® were placed in an Eppendorf ® test tube containing 0.02 M phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) with pH of 7.0 (1 PerioPaper Strips ® /500 µL PBS). Samples were mixed for 30 s with a vortex mixer and then centrifuged (4 • C, 3000× g, 5 min) [20]. The supernatant fluid was preserved for testing.…”
Section: Redox Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%