2021
DOI: 10.3390/colloids5020021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Hydrophilic Surfactants on the W1–W2 Coalescence in Double Emulsion Systems Investigated by Single Droplet Experiments

Abstract: Double emulsions are a promising formulation for encapsulation and targeted release in pharmaceutics, cosmetics and food. An inner water phase is dispersed in an oil phase, which is again emulsified in a second water phase. The encapsulated inner water phase can be released via diffusion or via coalescence, neither of which is desired during storage but might be intended during application. The two interfaces in a double emulsion are stabilized by a hydrophilic and a lipophilic surfactant, to prevent the coale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taboada et al [25] measured coalescence times ranging from 10 s up to more than 30 min for different emulsifiers in single droplet experiments with water as the continuous phase. Regarding nonionic surfactants, Leister et al [64] obtained coalescence times between 5 and around 100 s. The measurements from Taboada et al [25] and Leister et al [64] are within the same range as our calculated theoretical coalescence times. We expect induction times to be within the mentioned range, providing that the surfactant is dissolved in water, which is in good agreement with our experimental data (Figure 13).…”
Section: Induction Timesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Taboada et al [25] measured coalescence times ranging from 10 s up to more than 30 min for different emulsifiers in single droplet experiments with water as the continuous phase. Regarding nonionic surfactants, Leister et al [64] obtained coalescence times between 5 and around 100 s. The measurements from Taboada et al [25] and Leister et al [64] are within the same range as our calculated theoretical coalescence times. We expect induction times to be within the mentioned range, providing that the surfactant is dissolved in water, which is in good agreement with our experimental data (Figure 13).…”
Section: Induction Timesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For the interfacial tension measurements, microfluidics and single-droplet experiments, the MCT oil was purified according to the method described by Dopierala et al [36] before mixing with surfactants, since the impurities in the unpurified oil could have a great influence due to the small interfacial area compared to the sample volume [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the surfactant interactions, an often-discussed topic is whether the hydrophilic surfactant has a positive or a negative influence on the encapsulation efficiency. The general observation for PGPR-stabilized water droplets is that smaller hydrophilic surfactants are more likely to increase release than high-molecular-weight polymers [7,13,14]. Surprisingly, the outer interface, and thus O-O coalescence, is less commonly discussed in terms of the interactions between hydrophilic and lipophilic surfactants.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations