2007
DOI: 10.5194/os-3-509-2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of numerical schemes on current-topography interactions in 1/4° global ocean simulations

Abstract: Abstract. The combined use of partial steps and of an energy-enstrophy conserving momentum advection scheme was shown by Barnier et al. (2006) to yield substantial improvements in the surface solution of the DRAKKAR 1 4• global sea-ice/ocean model. The present study extends this investigation below the surface with a special focus on the Atlantic and reveals many improvements there as well: e.g. more realistic path, structure and transports of major currents (Gulf Stream, North Atlantic Current, Confluence reg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the transports are comparable in both configurations but the currents are much more vigorous in the eddy-permitting configuration. Barnier et al (2006), Penduff et al (2007) and Le Sommer et al (2009) show how the use of an energy-and enstrophyconserving momentum advection scheme in NEMO at 1/4 • yielded a clear improvement in the simulation of currenteddy-topography interactions, and thus of along-topography circulations. Comparisons between a large current meter database (Holloway, 2008) and two DRAKKAR global ocean simulations (T. Penduff, personal communication, 2009) confirm that increasing NEMO's resolution from 2 • to 1/4 • yields a large reduction of local model-observation mismatches, both in terms of mean current strengths (which increase toward observed levels) and directions (aligning with measured flows more nearly along isobaths), in particular along basin margins where many current meters are located.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And ε Nd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, the transports are comparable in both configurations but the currents are much more vigorous in the eddy-permitting configuration. Barnier et al (2006), Penduff et al (2007) and Le Sommer et al (2009) show how the use of an energy-and enstrophyconserving momentum advection scheme in NEMO at 1/4 • yielded a clear improvement in the simulation of currenteddy-topography interactions, and thus of along-topography circulations. Comparisons between a large current meter database (Holloway, 2008) and two DRAKKAR global ocean simulations (T. Penduff, personal communication, 2009) confirm that increasing NEMO's resolution from 2 • to 1/4 • yields a large reduction of local model-observation mismatches, both in terms of mean current strengths (which increase toward observed levels) and directions (aligning with measured flows more nearly along isobaths), in particular along basin margins where many current meters are located.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And ε Nd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PISCES is currently embedded into two modeling systems: NEMO (Madec, 2008) and ROMS_AGRIF (Penven et al, 2006;Debreu et al, 2011). It can be downloaded from their respective web sites:…”
Section: O Aumont Et Al: a Description Of Pisces-v2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution is about 2 • by 2 • cos (where is the latitude) with a focusing of the meridional resolution to 0.5 • in the equatorial domain. The model has 30 vertical layers, with an increased vertical thickness from 10 m at the surface to 500 m at 5000 m. Representation of the topography is based on the partial step thicknesses Penduff et al, 2007). Lateral mixing along isopycnal surfaces is performed both on tracers and momentum as in Lengaigne et al (2003).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barnier et al, 2006;Penduff et al, 2007Penduff et al, , 2010Treguier et al, 2014;Marzocchi et al, 2015). The FRM at 1/4 • horizontal resolution is referred to here as ORCA025 and has 46 z levels, with thickness ranging from 6 m at the surface to 250 m at the ocean bottom.…”
Section: Free-running Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%