Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement

Burke, F. J. T.; Wilson, Nairn; Cheung, SW; Mjör, Ivar A.

doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00022-7

Cited by 163 publications

(163 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

129

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It could be considered that this contributes to the cost effectiveness of the NHS system, but the results of a recent cross-sectional survey have indicated that restorations placed within the NHS funding arrangements are replaced sooner than restorations placed within private funding arrangements or in the armed forces. [11][12] This study also reported that dentists in the armed forces treated an average of 11 patients per day, which is substantially less than the number of patients treated by the respondents in the present study, most of whom were working within the NHS arrangements.…”

Section: Equipment Usedcontrasting

confidence: 46%

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:To investigate, by questionnaire, various aspects of primary dental care provision in the North West of England and Scotland. Method: A questionnaire containing 79 questions was sent to 1,000 practitioners, selected at random, in the North West of England and Scotland. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed. Results: Overall a response rate of 70% was achieved. The majority of practitioners were practice principals (65%), working in a group NHS practice (80%) located in a city or town centre (49%). On average 10-20 patients were treated each session with fewer patients treated per session under private arrangements. Many practitioners were found to lack hygienist support (44%) and to employ unqualified dental nurses (82%). Younger practitioners were more likely than senior colleagues to have access to up-to-date computers whilst 37% and 74% of respondents never used CAL programmes or magnification respectively. Contemporary cross-infection control standards were used by the majority of practitioners, although 3% of practitioners reported only autoclaving their handpiece once a day. Conclusions: The majority of practitioners, involved in this study, worked under National Health Service (NHS) regulations as principals in a group practice where the workload was greater than the private/independent sector. Contemporary cross-infection procedures were used routinely. In contrast computer-aided learning programmes and magnification were not used routinely. The practitioners in this study employed significant numbers of unqualified dental nurses.

show abstract

Section: Equipment Usedcontrasting

confidence: 46%

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite recent advances in the prevention of dental caries, the disease continues to be a global public health problem and is the main reason for the placement and replacement of dental restorations [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Once placed, the restorations should be followed-up, which places a lot of demand on oral health services and their professionals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2015 July-August; 44(4): [213][214][215][216][217] of the clinical time spent treating adults [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . However, preserving restorations in a satisfactory clinical condition for long periods is a challenge, despite the evolution of restorative materials and operative techniques.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival time of direct dental restorations in adults

Dutra

Tapety

Mendes

et al. 2015

Rev. odontol. UNESP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoIntrodução: A cárie dentária é o principal motivo para a instalação e troca de restaurações. A preservação destas em condição clínica satisfatória é um desafio, apesar da evolução dos materiais e técnicas cirúrgico-operatórias. Objetivo: Investigar o tempo de sobrevida e características técnico-operatórias das restaurações dentárias diretas de adultos em Teresina, Piauí. Material e método: A coleta de dados ocorreu de setembro de 2009 a janeiro de 2010, em clínicas de tratamento odontológico sem fins lucrativos. Os dados técnicos e operatórios do preparo cavitário e da restauração foram coletados no momento da substituição. A sobrevida foi calculada a partir da data de instalação que constava no prontuário. Os dados foram registrados em um formulário criado com esse fim. Kruskal-Wallis e Mann-Whitney foram empregados para comparar a sobrevida dos diferentes tipos de restaurações e o teste qui-quadrado para associações entre variáveis qualitativas, ambos com nível de significância de 5%. Resultado: As 262 substituições de restaurações deficientes estavam em 139 pacientes. A mediana de sobrevida das restaurações foi 2 anos. As restaurações de amálgama tiveram sobrevivência maior que as de resina composta (p=0,004). O material restaurador mais substituído foi resina composta (66,4%). A maioria das restaurações localizava-se em dentes anteriores e em preparos proximais. Conclusão: As restaurações de amálgama teve sobrevida maior que as de resina composta. As variáveis técnico-operacionais não influenciaram na taxa de substituições. As restaurações diretas possuem reduzido tempo de sobrevida o que pode estar associada à filosofia adotada pelo serviço para o tratamento fornecido.Descritores: Falha de restauração dentária; restauração dentária permanente; pesquisa baseada na prática. AbstractIntroduction: The presence of dental caries is the main reason for the placement and replacement of restorations. Maintaining restorations to a satisfactory clinical condition is a challenge, despite the evolution of materials and surgical operative techniques. Objective: To investigate the survival time and technical-operatory characteristics of dental restorations among adults in Teresina-PI. Material and method: Data collection was carried out from September 2009 to January 2010 at a non-profit dental service. Data were collected at the moment of restoration replacement. The sample consisted of 262 defective restorations in 139 individuals. Survival time was calculated using the placement date that was registered on the individual's dental form. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the survival time of the different types of restorations and the chi-square test was used to assess the association between qualitative variables, at a 5% significance level. Result: The median survival time of the restorations was 2 years. The survival time for amalgam was higher than for composite and glass ionomer cement (p=0.004). The most replaced dental material was the composite (66.4%). The majority of the replaced ...

show abstract

“…31 There are no shortcuts when using posterior resinbased composites, and any compromise in the placement technique could have serious consequences for the clinical performance. Dentists should realize that placing a posterior resin-based composite could take approximately two-and-a-half times longer than placing a similar amalgam restoration.…”

Section: Marginal Discolorationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

Kiremitçi¹,

Alpaslan²,

Gürgan³

2009

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Kiremitci • T Alpaslan • S Gurgan Clinical RelevanceAs a posterior composite, Filtek P60 exhibited very good clinical performance in Class II cavities for six years. Methods: A total of 47 restorations were placed in the Class II cavity preparations (27 premolars and 20 molars) of 33 patients (22 female/11 male; mean age 34) by the same operator. The restorations were evaluated by two examiners at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 6 years according to the method developed by Ryge, which also is known as the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The following characteristics were observed: marginal adaptation, anatomical form, surface texture, marginal discoloration, surface staining, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. The Chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis (p=0.05).Results: All the restorations received Alpha scores at baseline assessment, except for one restoration, which showed post-operative sensitivity. At the three-year recall examination, two patients, with a total of three restorations, were not included. From baseline to three years, only two of the 44 restorations changed from Alpha to Conclusions: The clinical performance of the posterior composite restorations that were evaluated was acceptable after six years of service.

show abstract

Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement

Cited by 163 publications

References 17 publications

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements

Survival time of direct dental restorations in adults

Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About