1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(94)90058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of regeneration method and tissue source on the frequency of somatic variation in Populus to infection by Septoria musiva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Ostray et al 1994). However, the possibility of generating somaclonal variations still exists Raina 2000, Bindiya andKanwar 2003).…”
Section: ⎯⎯⎯⎯mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1). Micropropagated plants derived from shoot tips and axillary buds have been previously reported to maintain clonal stability (Ahuja 1987, Ostray et al 1994. However, occasionally there is still a chance of obtaining somaclonal variation through adopting this approach (Rani and Raina 2000).…”
Section: ⎯⎯⎯⎯mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Leela et al (2011) using RAPD analysis also recorded no somaclonal variation of regenerants. In accordance with some authors, the use of pre-existing meristems such as shoot tips and axillary buds from the hardwood shoot cuttings lower the risk of somaclonal variations (Ahuja, 1987;Ostry et al, 1994;Wang and Charles, 1991). These kinds of competent and pre-determined explants have less necessity of high growth regulator concentrations for micropropagation process when compared with organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis process using no meristematic explants.…”
Section: Foliar Explants Organogenesismentioning
confidence: 80%