2012
DOI: 10.1126/science.1216937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Synaptic Vesicle Position on Release Probability and Exocytotic Fusion Mode

Abstract: Neurotransmission depends on movements of transmitter-laden synaptic vesicles, but accurate, nanometer-scale monitoring of vesicle dynamics in presynaptic terminals has remained elusive. Here, we report three-dimensional, real-time tracking of quantum dot-loaded single synaptic vesicles with an accuracy of 20 to 30 nanometers, less than a vesicle diameter. Determination of the time, position, and mode of fusion, aided by trypan blue quenching of Qdot fluorescence, revealed that vesicles starting close to their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
164
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
18
164
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we find greater NMDAR activation at MVR than UVR synapses, excluding synapses with high rates of asynchrony. In addition, FF release is reported to be evenly distributed across the active zone while KR is located more centrally (Park et al, 2012); thus more glutamate would be released nearer the periphery at FF synapses than at KR-to-FF synapses and would lead to larger NMDAR currents, again contrary to our data. Though KR may well occur at PF synapses, we would suggest that, by itself, a KR-to-FF transient cannot account for our results.…”
Section: Distinct Populations Of Pf Terminalscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, we find greater NMDAR activation at MVR than UVR synapses, excluding synapses with high rates of asynchrony. In addition, FF release is reported to be evenly distributed across the active zone while KR is located more centrally (Park et al, 2012); thus more glutamate would be released nearer the periphery at FF synapses than at KR-to-FF synapses and would lead to larger NMDAR currents, again contrary to our data. Though KR may well occur at PF synapses, we would suggest that, by itself, a KR-to-FF transient cannot account for our results.…”
Section: Distinct Populations Of Pf Terminalscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…S3 shows fast measurements). Of importance, given that membrane retrieval in KO terminals was affected only mildly, our observations here differ from kiss-and-run type exocytosis (30). In addition, WT and KO terminals responded similarly to perturbation of AP2 by dialysis of a Synaptotagmin 2 (Syt2) 2-derived AP2-binding peptide (9), resulting in nearly complete elimination of membrane retrieval and of SV replenishment in both genotypes (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The estimated recovery is 20% smaller at the end of fast recovery and 25% smaller at 6 min during slow recovery (Fig. 5P), suggesting that both phases of recovery are under the influence of additional factors (16,24,31,32). However, although these additional factors appear to be involved in the control of RRP recovery rates for fast and slow pathways (Fig.…”
Section: Distinct Roles Of Dynamin Isoforms During Low-frequency Apmentioning
confidence: 92%