2013
DOI: 10.2495/str130291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the maintenance in seismic response of Lorca historic centre masonry residential buildings after the 11 May 2011 earthquake

Abstract: Lorca, the city centre of which had been one of the first in Spain to be declared an artistic historic site (1964), is an earthquake prone city. This is the reason why its unreinforced masonry vernacular residential architecture includes reinforcement features (quoins, pegs or ring beams) reducing the seismic vulnerability and improving, consequently, their seismic behaviour. Nevertheless, the seismic response of those buildings to the Lorca May 11th 2011 earthquake was very heterogeneous; it is important to p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Despite the influence of the construction techniques, the state of preservation is a determinant factor in the buildings seismic performance, especially in the case of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, not only for the building itself, but also due to the lack of the stabilizing contribution of neighbouring cells when the maintenance level is bad or the building is ruined (Carocci, Lagomarsino, 2009;Basset-Salom, Guardiola-Víllora, 2013;Guardiola-Víllora, Basset-Salom, 2019). Figure 3 shows buildings of the same typology but with different state of preservation.…”
Section: Information Of the Building Stock For Seismic Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Despite the influence of the construction techniques, the state of preservation is a determinant factor in the buildings seismic performance, especially in the case of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, not only for the building itself, but also due to the lack of the stabilizing contribution of neighbouring cells when the maintenance level is bad or the building is ruined (Carocci, Lagomarsino, 2009;Basset-Salom, Guardiola-Víllora, 2013;Guardiola-Víllora, Basset-Salom, 2019). Figure 3 shows buildings of the same typology but with different state of preservation.…”
Section: Information Of the Building Stock For Seismic Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%