Despite the extensive use of oral splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and bruxism, their mechanisms of action remain controversial. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain their apparent efficacy (i.e., true therapeutic value), including the repositioning of the condyle and/or the articular disc, reduction in the electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscles, modification of the patient's "harmful" oral behavior, and changes in the patient's occlusion. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, it is concluded that any of these theories is either poor or inconsistent, while the issue of true efficacy for oral splints remains unsettled. However, the results of a controlled clinical trial lend support to the effectiveness (i.e., the patient's appreciation of the positive changes which are perceived to have occurred during the trial) of the stabilizing splint in the control of myofascial pain. In light of the data supporting their effectiveness but not their efficacy, oral splints should be used as an adjunct for pain management rather than a definitive treatment. For sleep bruxism, it is prudent to limit their use as a habit management aid and to prevent/limit dental damage potentially induced by the disorder. Future research should study the natural history and etiologies of TMD and bruxism, so that specific treatments for these disorders can be developed.Key words. Oral splints, temporomandibular disorders, bruxism, myofascial pain, disc displacement disorders.
(I) IntroductionAmong the treatments provided for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), intra-oral dental appliances, whether with full or partial occlusal coverage, and referred to in this paper as oral splints, have been repeatedly reported as being the most widely adopted choice. Introduced by Karolyi in 1901 (see Ramfjord and Ash, 1994) for the treatment of bruxism, it is striking to see the versatility of their current applications. Other than their use in the prevention of dental injuries and oral soft-tissue trauma potentially induced by bruxism, sports, cheek biting (Walker and Rogers, 1992), and electroconvulsive therapy (Minneman, 1995), oral splints of various designs have been prescribed in the management of diverse disorders including: (a) motor disorders such as Parkinson's disease (Durham et al., 1993) and oral tardive dyskinesia (Kai et al., 1994); (b) sleep disorders such as snoring (George, 1993) and sleep apnea (George, 1993;Athanasiou et al., 1994;Lowe, 1994;Yoshida, 1994;Osseiran, 1995); (c) sensitive teeth related to chronic sinusitis (Dawson, 1974); (d) various headaches, from the tension-type to migraine (Ouayle et al., 1990;Lamey and Steele, 1996); and (e) all subgroups of TMD, e.g., myofascial pain, disc displacement disorders, and the arthritides (Table 1).It is also surprising to see the wide acceptance of oral splints and their "multi-purpose usage", while little is known about the mechanisms by which they exert their effect. For the TMD, a survey of 10,000 members of...