2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3705049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Acquisition in Matching Markets: The Role of Price Discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main insight for this stage of the proof lies in the third step, where we leverage structural properties of the agents' decision problem to show that the optimal stationary equilibrium in each submarket produces at least half the first-best welfare of that submarket. 16 These steps, together with Proposition 4.3, prove our approximation result Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Designing An Approximately Optimal Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our main insight for this stage of the proof lies in the third step, where we leverage structural properties of the agents' decision problem to show that the optimal stationary equilibrium in each submarket produces at least half the first-best welfare of that submarket. 16 These steps, together with Proposition 4.3, prove our approximation result Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Designing An Approximately Optimal Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Taking a communication complexity approach, Gonczarowski et al [13] and Ashlagi et al [6] establish bounds on the the amount of communication, measured by the number of bits, needed to find a stable match in markets with private preferences. The recent work of Immorlica et al [16] focuses on a setting where learning preferences is costly and show how costly information acquisition impacts an agent's preference. Further, a few recent papers, such as Liu et al [20], use the multi-armed bandit framework to model the process of learning preferences as an online learning problem and develop efficient learning algorithms.…”
Section: Search and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our setting does not have pre-determined priorities. When students do have such priorities, e.g., priorities determined by siblings' school attendance or test score, they may have incentives to acquire information on others' preferences and priorities under DA as shown in Grenet et al (2019) and Immorlica et al (2020). The intuition is that others' preferences and priorities help a student assess the probability of being accepted by each school and that a student does not need to learn about schools that will never accept her.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…identify optimal truncation strategies in a large class of markets. We illustrate cases in which truncation strategies are sub-optimal.3Immorlica et al (2020) examine how the design of school-choice systems affects information acquisition Fernandez (2020). shows that DA only supports stable outcomes when agents avoid regret.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has identified various conditions under which large markets entail small cores (see, e.g.,Immorlica andMahdian, 2005 andAshlagi et al, 2017). Our analysis speaks to such settings.8 These include α-reducibility(Clark, 2006), the co-ranking condition(Legros and Newman, 2010), the universality condition(Holzman and Samet, 2014), the aligned preferences condition(Ferdowsian, Niederle, and Yariv, 2021), and oriented preferences(Reny, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%