2013
DOI: 10.1089/elj.2012.0161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information at the Margin: Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws, Ballot Issues, and Voter Knowledge

Abstract: All 24 states that permit voters to cast ballots directly on policy matters also require that contributions and expenditures on ballot issue campaigns be disclosed publicly. Scholars assert that information about the financial involvement of interest groups in ballot issue campaigns provides voters with valuable cues about how to vote on potentially complex and confusing issues. In this article, I argue that the proper way to assess the informational benefits of disclosure is to assess whether the information … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Voters might use campaign finance information as a heuristic, an informational shortcut that allows low-information voters to vote as if they had more ''encyclopedic'' knowledge (Lupia 1994). Quantifying the information benefit is difficult, though a few scholars are making headway (Primo 2013;Fortier and Malbin 2013;Carpenter 2009). For example, experimental evidence has shown that the effects of attack ads are neutralized when donors are revealed (Dowling and Wichowsky 2015).…”
Section: The Benefits and Costs Of Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voters might use campaign finance information as a heuristic, an informational shortcut that allows low-information voters to vote as if they had more ''encyclopedic'' knowledge (Lupia 1994). Quantifying the information benefit is difficult, though a few scholars are making headway (Primo 2013;Fortier and Malbin 2013;Carpenter 2009). For example, experimental evidence has shown that the effects of attack ads are neutralized when donors are revealed (Dowling and Wichowsky 2015).…”
Section: The Benefits and Costs Of Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campaign finance, of course, is a large and debated topic, spanning candidate and ballot-issue contexts; recent US Supreme Court decisions (e.g., Citizens United v. FEC); the role of money in politics (Gaughan 2016;Gerken 2014;Krumholz 2013;Mayer 2016); and the efficacy of disclosure (Hasen 2011;Munger 2009;Primo 2013;Primo and Milyo 2006;Wood and Spencer 2016)-to name only a few. By necessity, a simulation created to be implemented within the confines of one class meeting must be narrowly focused.…”
Section: Simulating Campaign Financementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In elections where there are few cues for voters, knowing that an environmental group supports or opposes a candidate or ballot initiative can be vital information to citizens trying to make decisions (Lau and Redlawsk 2006). Therefore, all states to use ballot initiatives and referenda require interest groups running ads on ballot issues to disclose their advertising expenditures (Primo 2013). Of course, disclosing donor information goes beyond a group simply disclosing that it ran an advertisement.…”
Section: Concealing Business Influencementioning
confidence: 99%