1998
DOI: 10.1177/1046496498296003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Sharing in Face-to-Face, Teleconferencing, and Electronic Chat Groups

Abstract: Laboratory groups attempted to reach consensus on a simulated business problem. Members of 4-person groups received information on whether three proposed systems met each of IO desired criteria. Cast as a hidden profile problem, the information was distributed unevenly within the group. Groups communicated using one ofthreeformats:face-to-face, teleconference, or electronic chat. As predicted, cognitive workload was significantly higher andfewer correct decisions were obtained in the electronic chat condition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
66
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion above is also well aligned with the consistent empirical finding that e-communication in general is perceived as more ambiguous than face-to-face communication [3], [18], [22], [24], [27], [57]. While there are studies that show that individuals can voluntarily or involuntarily compensate for this increase in communication ambiguity by means of constructing better thought out messages [18], [62], and by becoming familiar with the medium and their partners [3], [22], to the best of our knowledge there have been no studies suggesting that the suppression of media naturalness elements causes a reduction in communication ambiguity (i.e., the opposite effect to what we hypothesize here).…”
Section: Effects Of Media Naturalness On Communication Attributessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The conclusion above is also well aligned with the consistent empirical finding that e-communication in general is perceived as more ambiguous than face-to-face communication [3], [18], [22], [24], [27], [57]. While there are studies that show that individuals can voluntarily or involuntarily compensate for this increase in communication ambiguity by means of constructing better thought out messages [18], [62], and by becoming familiar with the medium and their partners [3], [22], to the best of our knowledge there have been no studies suggesting that the suppression of media naturalness elements causes a reduction in communication ambiguity (i.e., the opposite effect to what we hypothesize here).…”
Section: Effects Of Media Naturalness On Communication Attributessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is problematic for two reasons. The first is that rational choice theories seem to explain communication media perceptions and choice in a limited yet reasonably robust way under specific circumstances (Allen and Griffeth 1997, Daft et al 1987, Graetz et al 1998, Straub and Karahanna 1998, which provides justification for attempts (carried out more than 10 years after the original development of those theories) to expand and refine them (Carlson and Zmud 1999) as well as to combine them with social theories (Trevino et al 2000). The second reason is that the 1990s have seen the development of theories that emphasize the influence of technology features-not social elements-on CMC behavior that have little to do with the social presence and media richness theories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces outils permettent un dosage entre le synchrone et l'asynchrone de manière à faciliter les communications et la collaboration. Certaines technologies ont un potentiel plus important que d'autres pour faire voyager l'information, que ce soit sur le plan des émotions ou de la compréhension du sens et des intentions, ce qui permet une compréhension plus complète et efficiente du message (Graetz et al, 1998). Le premier moyen retenu, la vidéoconférence, favorise les échanges en temps synchrone, ce qui facilite l'adhésion et l'engagement au projet, de même que les communications.…”
Section: Le Réseau Et La Communauté D'apprentissage Professionnelle :unclassified