2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1176-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informational Needs of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Abstract: The patient journey with head and neck cancer (HNC) is particularly challenging given the physical and functional impact of the cancer and treatment. The ability to perform activities of daily living can be severely compromised and have a profound impact on psychosocial well-being. These complex and long-lasting effects can affect patient quality of life for months to years and the literature shows that information for HNC patients is often insufficient. This observational cross-sectional study utilized survey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, informational needs of cancer patients were awareness of the nature of the disease, Its management, and different cancer treatments other than chemical treatments. According to previous studies, the most important informational needs of patients with head, neck, oral, pharyngeal, gynecologic, and gastrointestinal cancer, related to physical, medical, emotional, practical, social, and spiritual domains; respectively (Papadakos et al, 2017;Giuliani et al, 2016;Manne et al, 2016;Papadakos et al, 2012;Papadakos et al, 2015;Khoshnood et al, 2018a). On the other hand, some factors related to ways of providing information to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, informational needs of cancer patients were awareness of the nature of the disease, Its management, and different cancer treatments other than chemical treatments. According to previous studies, the most important informational needs of patients with head, neck, oral, pharyngeal, gynecologic, and gastrointestinal cancer, related to physical, medical, emotional, practical, social, and spiritual domains; respectively (Papadakos et al, 2017;Giuliani et al, 2016;Manne et al, 2016;Papadakos et al, 2012;Papadakos et al, 2015;Khoshnood et al, 2018a). On the other hand, some factors related to ways of providing information to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Mulcare et al, (2011) whereas, a patient who exhibited a cognitively avoidant adjustment style would have low needs for disease orientated information. In addition, Papadakos et al, (2017) investigated the most highly rated informational needs in cancer patients. These needs were information about side effects prevention and management, the possible side effects induced by cancer treatment methods, and treatment of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another benefit is that patients receive education materials that are endorsed directly by their health care providers. The literature shows that patients prefer and trust information that is given to them by their health care providers over information they find themselves, 20 and the Digital Education Prescription facilitates this exchange. In addition, the digital patient education ecosystem houses standardized course content for consistent teaching across professions; all of the materials included adhere to patient education best practices, including adult learning principles, plain language, and plain design, which can support health literacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When patients receive accurate information about their illness and its prognosis, they can take realistic actions about self-care and disease management (27). Papadakos (2017), Giuliani et al (2016), and Manne (2016) highlight the need for information in patients with cancer about physical care, medical information, and information to meet the emotional, social and spiritual needs (28)(29)(30). A systematic review by Moghaddam et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%