ABSTRACT:A previous study suggested that fluvoxamine inhibition potency toward CYP1A2 is 10 times greater in vivo than in vitro. The present study was designed to determine whether the same gap exists for CYP2C19, another isozyme inhibited by fluvoxamine. In vitro studies examined the effect of nonspecific binding on the determination of inhibition constant (K i ) values of fluvoxamine toward CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes and in a cDNA-expressed microsomal (Supersomes) system using (S)-mephenytoin as a CYP2C19 probe. K i values based on total added fluvoxamine concentration (K i,total ) and unbound fluvoxamine concentration (K i,ub ) were calculated, and interindividual variability in K i values was examined in six nonfatty livers. There has been a growing interest in predicting in vivo metabolic drug-drug interactions from in vitro systems. In the case of inhibitionbased interactions, there is no consensus on the methodology for accurate predictions of the extent of in vivo inhibition based on in vitro data (Schmider et al., 1999;Yamano et al., 1999;Kohl and Steinkellner, 2000;Komatsu et al., 2000;Yao and Levy, 2002). Several issues remain unsolved, such as estimations of inhibition constants in vitro and inhibitor concentration around the enzyme site in vivo. For example, studies on fluvoxamine inhibition of CYP1A2 have shown that in vitro K i values varied with microsomal protein concentration (Yao et al., 2001), suggesting that the concentration of microsomal protein present in the incubation is a factor contributing to the variance in in vitro K i . However, even after correction for nonspecific binding of fluvoxamine in microsomes, there was still a 10-fold difference between the in vitro inhibition constant and the corresponding in vivo inhibition constant based on unbound fluvoxamine concentration in plasma.The 10-fold underprediction of fluvoxamine inhibition potency toward CYP1A2 activity in vivo, based on in vitro data, may be due to a number of factors. These include, but are not limited to, active uptake of fluvoxamine from plasma into hepatocytes, thereby increasing the amount of inhibitor available to the enzyme (partitioning), the presence of inhibitory metabolites of fluvoxamine in plasma, and/or environmental differences that may differentially affect enzyme behavior or affinity in the two systems. Should it be the case that some type of partitioning alone is the dominant factor governing the in vitro-in vivo difference, one might expect that the RK i (the ratio of the in vitro K i to the in vivo K i based on unbound concentration) of any enzyme inhibited by fluvoxamine would be similar to that of CYP1A2. In essence, RK i would be largely enzyme independent. However, if inhibitory metabolites or enzyme environment play important roles in promoting the RK i difference, RK i values might become enzyme-dependent. A suitable candidate enzyme was sought to test the hypothesis that RK i values will be conserved for a single inhibitor among the family of P450 1 enzymes. There is some in vivo evide...