Variation in Working Memory 2008
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention

Abstract: This chapter focuses on a set of attentional or executive control processes, all inhibitory, that operate in the service of an individual's goals to narrow and constrain the contents of consciousness to be goal relevant. An uncluttered or narrowly focused “working memory,” rather than a large one, is the ideal processing system. The narrow focus maximizes the speed and accuracy of on-line processing because it reduces the likelihood of switching attention to goal-irrelevant representations. The work is similar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

47
473
8
33

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(561 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
47
473
8
33
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with findings that distracting stimuli or stimuli that interrupt goal-directed processing impose higher performance costs in ageing than in younger individuals (Clapp, Rubens, Sabarwal, & Gazzaley, 2011;Clapp & Gazzaley, 2012). Deficits in distractor disengagement with ageing would also be expected according to Hasher et al (2007) framework that proposes three critical inhibitory functions compromised in ageing (i) to implement control over prepotent response tendencies (ii) to prevent access of irrelevant items and, crucially, (iii) to delete information that has been attended but that it is no longer relevant.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is consistent with findings that distracting stimuli or stimuli that interrupt goal-directed processing impose higher performance costs in ageing than in younger individuals (Clapp, Rubens, Sabarwal, & Gazzaley, 2011;Clapp & Gazzaley, 2012). Deficits in distractor disengagement with ageing would also be expected according to Hasher et al (2007) framework that proposes three critical inhibitory functions compromised in ageing (i) to implement control over prepotent response tendencies (ii) to prevent access of irrelevant items and, crucially, (iii) to delete information that has been attended but that it is no longer relevant.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is certainly the case that alternative, overlapping conceptualizations of working memory abound (e.g., working memory and inhibition may be seen as interdependent processes or that working memory may be seen as reflecting limitations in the ability to limit the processing of irrelevant information (Hasher, Lustig, & Zacks, 2007). However, the conception of working memory capacity as a domain general attentional resource limitation is the one that seems dominant in the literature on the working memory training effects considered here.…”
Section: The Nature Of Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…EF relies heavily on the frontal lobes which are known to be highly vulnerable to the aging process, with marked changes in physiology and anatomy of these areas in the elderly (Bugg, DeLosh, & Clegg, 2006). Hackney, (1998) andWest, Murphy, Armilio, Craik, andStuss (2002) also reported TOD effects on inhibitory tasks in the elderly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%