2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial results of high‐latitude magnetopause and low‐latitude flank flux transfer events from 3 years of Cluster observations

Abstract: [1] We present initial results from a statistical study of Cluster multispacecraft flux transfer event (FTE) observations at the high-latitude magnetopause and low-latitude flanks from February 2001 to June 2003. Cluster FTEs are observed at both the highlatitude magnetopause and low-latitude flanks for both southward and northward IMF. Among the 1222 FTEs, 36%, 20%, 14%, and 30% are seen by one, two, three, and four Cluster satellites, respectively. There are 73% (27%) of the FTEs observed outside (inside) th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
84
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(82 reference statements)
8
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…during periods of southward IMF orientation. (Wang et al, 2005). The solid curve shows a fit to the distribution.…”
Section: Results For the Magnetospherementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…during periods of southward IMF orientation. (Wang et al, 2005). The solid curve shows a fit to the distribution.…”
Section: Results For the Magnetospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the magnitude of this effect and for comparison with prior observations studies, we must identify the fraction of FTEs with amplitudes exceeding a specified detection threshold as a function of the shear angle θ between the magnetosheath and magnetospheric magnetic fields. Figure 4 presents the distribution of FTE magnetic field strength perturbations (peak -surroundings) observed by Cluster on the flank and high-latitude dayside magnetopause as reported by Wang et al (2005) and a fit given by…”
Section: Occurrence Patterns At the Dayside Magnetopausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we report a comprehensive survey of the MESSENGER magnetic field data for the occurrence of FTEs. From definitions developed for Earth's magnetosphere [e.g., Wang et al, 2005;Fear et al, 2007], six FTEs were identified during the two flybys with all, save one, strongly resembling flux ropes. Unfortunately, MESSENGER does not make the high-time-resolution plasma moment measurements necessary to analyze these FTEs using the Grad-Shafranov (GS) reconstruction technique [Zhang et al, 2008;Eriksson et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equatorward motion (one of the possibilities proposed by Kawano and Russell, 1997b) was explained by the Cooling et al (2001) model, which showed that if the component reconnection site was initiated in the Southern Hemisphere and in the super-Alfvénic magnetosheath flow region, the open magnetic field lines which were connected to the Southern Hemisphere ionosphere would be swept across the location of the X-line and could be swept equatorward, matching the observed motion of the FTEs. Wang et al (2005Wang et al ( , 2006 presented a larger survey of 1222 FTEs observed by Cluster, based on two and a half magnetopause crossing seasons (February 2001to June 2003. These authors observed that approximately 30% of events were observed by all four spacecraft, although during this time the inter-spacecraft distance at the magnetopause crossing varied from ∼100 km to ∼1 R E .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar percentage of magnetosheath events was observed if the high latitude (near-noon) and low latitude (flank) regions were examined separately. Wang et al (2005) suggested that this was because FTEs were more likely to extend further out into the magnetosheath than they extend into the magnetosphere; recent analysis of some individual FTEs observed by Cluster has confirmed that this may be the case (Hasegawa et al, 2006). However, a further possible explanation is that the magnetospheric signatures of FTEs at high latitudes, particularly in the vicinity of the cusp, may often be more complicated than low latitude signatures, possibly leading to an underestimate of the number of magnetospheric events (Thompson et al, 2004;Fear et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%