Inkjet-printed electrochemically reduced graphene oxide microelectrode as a platform for HT-2 mycotoxin immunoenzymatic biosensing

Kudr, Jiří; Zhao, Lei; Nguyen, Emily P.; Arola, Henri; Nevanen, Tarja K.; Adam, Vojtěch; Zítka, Ondřej; Merkoçi, Arben

doi:10.1016/j.bios.2020.112109

Cited by 53 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their workflow comprised i) pre-coating of magnetic particles (not included in the total analysis time), ii) immunoassay on magnetic particles as a solid support with a reporting antibody labelled with alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and iii) electrochemical analysis. The product of enzymatic cleavage of 1-naphthyl phosphate by ALP, 1-naphthol, was analysed using carbon black-modified screen-printed electrodes and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) [ 83 ]. The report addresses several current challenges, such as total analysis time (below 30 min here), easy sampling (untreated saliva) and portability (printed sensor and portable potentiostat).…”

Section: Design Of Coronavirus Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19: A challenge for electrochemical biosensors

Kudr

Michálek

Ilieva

et al. 2021

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Design Of Coronavirus Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19: A challenge for electrochemical biosensors

Kudr

Michálek

Ilieva

et al. 2021

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The use of graphene to quercetin and rutin simultaneously using modified SPCE showed better linearity, precision, the detection dan quantitation limit, and stability compared to commercial SPCE. In the development of a screenprinted electrode, graphene (Karuwan et al, 2012;Karuwan et al, 2013), graphene oxide (Kudr et al, 2020), single-walled carbon nanotube (Tortorich et al, 2014), or multi-walled carbon nanotube (Da Costa et al, 2015) also can be used as a carbon substitute in the working electrode.…”

Section: Components For the Fabrication Of Spce Conductive Materials For Spce Fabricationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rough surface of the substrate is preferred due to ease in the ink printing process and produced a good quality of screen-printed electrode. The substrates have been used to fabricate SPCE are ceramic (Taleat et al, 2014), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film (Du et al, 2016), Whatman filter paper (Nontawong et al, 2018), ink press transparent film [5], poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) (PEN) (Kudr et al, 2020), and polyimide (Lesch et al, 2014) (Karuwan et al, 2013;Duekhuntod et al, 2019;Khaled et al, 2008;Khaled et al, 2010;Promphet et al, 2015;Tirawattanakoson et al, 2016;Wahyuni et al, 2021).…”

Section: Substrate For Spce Fabricationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, the Inkjet printing technique consumes less ink compared to the screen printing technique. Several printer models are used in SPCE fabrication by inkjet printing technique, for instance Fujifilm Dimatix Materials Printer (Karuwan et al, 2012;Kudr et al, 2020;Lesch et al, 2014;Sriprachuabwong et al, 2012;Cinti et al, 2018;Kit-Anan et al, 2012), printer inkjet HP Deskjet 5650 (Tortorich and Choi, 2012), HP Deskjet D4260 (Da Costa et al, 2015), Epson EcoTank ET-2650, Epson Stylus Photo 1500W (Rosati et al, 2019), and EPSON R230 (Cai et al, 2019).…”

Section: Fabrication Techniques Of Screen-printed Carbon Electrodementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Brief Review on Fabrication of Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode: Materials and Techniques

Wahyuni

Putra

Fauzi

et al. 2021

Indo. J. Chem. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) is one of the most interesting designs to combine a working (from carbon based material), reference, and counter electrode in a single-printed substrate. SPCE has been used in many electrochemical measurements due to its advantages for analysis in microscale. This paper summarises the main information about SPCE fabrication from the material and fabrication technique aspect on the flat substrate based on the work that has been published in the last 30 years. The success of SPCE fabrication is highly dependent on the composition of conductive ink which consists of conductive materials, binder, and solvents; substrate; and fabrication techniques. Among the carbon-based materials, the most widely used for SPCE fabrications are graphite, graphene, and carbon nanotubes. The frequent binder used are polymer-based materials such as polystyrene, polyaniline, poly 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene:polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), and polyvinyl chloride. The solvents used for SPCE fabrication are varied including water and various organic solvents. The main characteristics of the SPCE substrate should be inert in order to avoid any interferences during electrochemical measurements. The screen printing and inkjet printing technique are preferred for SPCE fabrication due to easy fabrication and the possibility for mass production of SPCE.

show abstract

“…For example, a recent study revealed that a 45% increase in electrochemical activity can be obtained when IJP‐printed graphene oxide traces are subsequently electrochemically reduced. [ 277 ] The result was an electrode with a limit of detection of 1.6 ng mL −1 for HT‐2 toxins that is comparable to high performance liquid chromatography, which is a widely used standard quantification method. Overall, the recent progress made in IJP‐fabricated electrodes demonstrates that the technology can exceed the current limitations of traditional fabrication techniques.…”

Section: Additive Manufacturing Of Ec Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additive Manufacturable Materials for Electrochemical Biosensor Electrodes

Elbadawi

Ong

Pollard

et al. 2020

Adv Funct Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the impending Industrial Revolution 4.0, the information produced by sensors will be central in many applications. This includes the healthcare sector, where affordable healthcare and precision medicine are highly sought after. Electrochemical sensors have the potential to produce affordable, high sensitivity and specificity, intuitive, and rapid point‐of‐care diagnostics. Underpinning these achievements is the choice of material and the fabrication thereof. In this review, the different types of materials used in electrochemical biosensors are reported, with a focus on synthetic conductive materials. The review demonstrates that there is an abundance of materials to select from, and compositing different types of materials further widens their applicability in biosensors. In addition, the fabrication of such materials using the state‐of‐the‐art of fabrication technology, additive manufacturing (AM), is also detailed. The need for compositing is evident in AM, as the feedstock for certain AM technologies is inherently nonconductive. Both material choice and fabrication technologies limitations are also discussed to highlight opportunities for growth. The review highlights how recent technological advancements have the potential to drive the healthcare industry toward achieving its primary goals.

show abstract

Inkjet-printed electrochemically reduced graphene oxide microelectrode as a platform for HT-2 mycotoxin immunoenzymatic biosensing

Cited by 53 publications

References 58 publications

COVID-19: A challenge for electrochemical biosensors

COVID-19: A challenge for electrochemical biosensors

A Brief Review on Fabrication of Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode: Materials and Techniques

Additive Manufacturable Materials for Electrochemical Biosensor Electrodes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About