2010
DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation Activity of Firms and Competition

Abstract: ÚvodEkonomové se shodnou na tom, že zdrojem značné části ekonomického růstu jsou nové technologie. Solow (1957) na základě exogenního modelu růstu odhadl, že 80 % růstu produktivity ve zpracovatelském průmyslu USA v období 1909-1949 lze přičíst na vrub technologického pokroku. Pozdější studie sice tento odhad poněkud snížily -např. Denison (1985) odhadl, že 68 % růstu produktivity práce pochází z technologického pokroku, 34 % ze zvýšení vzdělanosti pracovní síly, 22 % z širšího využití úspor z rozsahu a 13 % z… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the both null hypotheses cannot be rejected. Nevertheless there must be taken into account the results of similar surveys focused on whether innovative culture in organisations directly influences the economic success of organisations and whether innovative strategy is a factor that determines competitiveness (Martín- Republic where dependency between innovation culture and sector of the economy was proven, and also the research of Zemplinerová (2010) where the dependency between innovation culture and both size and sector of the organisation was proven. These results indicate, that dependencies between innovation culture and both sector and size of organisation may still be expected.…”
Section: Verification Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore the both null hypotheses cannot be rejected. Nevertheless there must be taken into account the results of similar surveys focused on whether innovative culture in organisations directly influences the economic success of organisations and whether innovative strategy is a factor that determines competitiveness (Martín- Republic where dependency between innovation culture and sector of the economy was proven, and also the research of Zemplinerová (2010) where the dependency between innovation culture and both size and sector of the organisation was proven. These results indicate, that dependencies between innovation culture and both sector and size of organisation may still be expected.…”
Section: Verification Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore possible to summarise that according to these definitions innovations do not cover only technical and technological changes and improvements, but in particular practical application and particularly originates from research. Human capital and creative research work are according to Zemplinerová (2010) and AutantBernard (2001) considered the most important determinants of innovation. Adair (2004) states that any innovative organisation should have a bucketful of ideas.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Zemplinerová (2010) to acquire a predominantly market share needs to be a fund budget for research, development and introduction of innovation Autant-Bernard et al (2013) argue the organization must have an original strategy and support the development of knowledge from and to the organization. It can be concluded that organizational innovation has a significant effect on the competitiveness of the company.…”
Section: Hypothesis Development Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the highly competitive environment of the business world, the goal of an informal micro-enterprise is to defeat competition and fulfill needs and wants of the customer (Moriah, 2010), and outperform competitors as mentioned by Porter (1985). There are various studies that support the idea of innovation as a business competitive advantage enabler, for example, technological innovations and competitive advantage (Martín-de Castro et al, 2013), development and introduction of innovations (Zemplinerová, 2010), regional innovation (Noruzy et. al., 2012;Autant-Bernard, Fadairo, & Massard, 2013), and capability of innovation (Martín-de et.…”
Section: Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%