2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2017-1144
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the diurnal cycle of global Earth outgoing radiation using a numerical weather prediction model

Abstract: Abstract.A globally-complete, high-temporal resolution and multiple-variable approach is employed to analyse the diurnal cycle of Earth's outgoing energy flows. This is made possible via the use of Met Office model output for September 2010 that is assessed alongside regional satellite observations throughout. Principal component analysis applied to the longwave component of modelled outgoing radiation reveals dominant diurnal patterns related to land surface heating and convective cloud development, respectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlations increase by a few percent and the biases decrease to about 10% when the CoCiP model results are included, at least for OT and OLR, as they should when aviation contrail effects are important. The agreement is best for OLR, which is sensitive to cirrus changes, with the lower troposphere humidity shielding part of the surface radiation, whereas RSR is more sensitive to surface albedo changes (Gristey et al., 2018; Stephens, 2005). Part of the RSR changes may be caused by low‐level clouds for reduced surface emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations increase by a few percent and the biases decrease to about 10% when the CoCiP model results are included, at least for OT and OLR, as they should when aviation contrail effects are important. The agreement is best for OLR, which is sensitive to cirrus changes, with the lower troposphere humidity shielding part of the surface radiation, whereas RSR is more sensitive to surface albedo changes (Gristey et al., 2018; Stephens, 2005). Part of the RSR changes may be caused by low‐level clouds for reduced surface emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the FBCT product applies a diurnal albedo model to obtain dailyaveraged fluxes that account for changes in solar geometry while assuming that cloud properties are invariant throughout the day, fixed at the time of the CERES overpass. However, the TOA shortwave flux is known to exhibit diurnal variability associated with cloud evolution (Doelling et al, 2013;Gristey et al, 2018;Rutan, Smith, & Wong, 2014). We therefore only use relative measures like albedo and transmissivity rather than absolute values like reflection when comparing data or applying values calculated in one dataset to another, as we do in Section 2.3.…”
Section: Clouds and The Earth's Radiant Energy System Datamentioning
confidence: 99%