Transport and Receptor Proteins of Plant Membranes 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3442-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the Structure of the Chloroplast Phosphate Translocator Protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early transport kineticists concluded that its demonstration eliminated the possibility that a transporter functions by a channel-type mechanism and suggested that clear boundaries exist between carriers and channels (79,135). Subsequent observations that certain "carriers" could apparently be converted into "channels" by chemical treatment (16,17,28,29,56), by imposition of large membrane potentials (131,132,149), or by ligand binding (13) led many students of transport to consider these boundaries indistinct. Our in silico phylogenetic and protein structural analyses suggest that these examples may be special cases and tend to reemphasize the importance of the channel-versus-carrier distinction (123,127).…”
Section: Transport Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early transport kineticists concluded that its demonstration eliminated the possibility that a transporter functions by a channel-type mechanism and suggested that clear boundaries exist between carriers and channels (79,135). Subsequent observations that certain "carriers" could apparently be converted into "channels" by chemical treatment (16,17,28,29,56), by imposition of large membrane potentials (131,132,149), or by ligand binding (13) led many students of transport to consider these boundaries indistinct. Our in silico phylogenetic and protein structural analyses suggest that these examples may be special cases and tend to reemphasize the importance of the channel-versus-carrier distinction (123,127).…”
Section: Transport Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such promiscuous use of energy is exceptionally rare and has been documented in only (16,17,28,29,56), or imposition of a large membrane potential (⌬⌿) across a membrane into which a TP-NST family member has been incorporated (131,132,149), has been reported to convert these antiport-catalyzing carriers into anion-selective channels capable of functioning by uniport. Another secondary carrier that may be capable of exhibiting channel-like properties is the KefC protein of E. coli (13), which is a member of the CPA2 family (TC 2.A.37).…”
Section: Families Of Transportersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a tentative model for the arrangement of the TPT in the membrane, it is probable that all 12 α-helices of the phosphate translocator dimer take part in forming a hydrophilic translocation channel through which the substrates could be transported across the membrane (75). Interestingly, two successive charged residues in helix V (Lysine, Arginine) that have been proposed to be involved in substrate binding (10) are conserved in all phosphate transport proteins.…”
Section: Molecular Identification and Characterization Of Plastidic Pmentioning
confidence: 99%