2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin infusion rate control in type 1 diabetes patients using information-theoretic model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mentioned control approaches in [ 13 , 23 26 ] it provides satisfactory performance in regulating BGL of T1DPs against parametric uncertainty and meal disturbance however it considered in the design the possibility of measuring all state variables which practically is not true for reasons of high cost and reliability. In [ 27 29 ] model predictive control (MPC) was utilized to regulate BGL of T1DP, it has the ability to deal with parametric uncertainty of glucose-insulin physiological system however the computational of iterative online optimization process is complex and its efficiency depends on how the accuracy of the predicted output is, in [ 30 ] nonlinear explicit MPC (NEMPC) was used to avoid the computational complexity of iterative online optimization, in [ 31 ] the output error state observer was used with MPC to correct the output variable prediction and hence improve the performance of the MPC, also in [ 32 ] extended kalman filter was used with NEMPC to estimate unavailable states for T1DP to improve the accuracy of the predicted BGL. To deal with unmeasured state variables, observer was used in conjunction with nonlinear adaptive controller in [ 33 ], with backstepping controller in [ 9 ], and with predictor feedback controller in [ 34 ] to estimate unmeasured state variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mentioned control approaches in [ 13 , 23 26 ] it provides satisfactory performance in regulating BGL of T1DPs against parametric uncertainty and meal disturbance however it considered in the design the possibility of measuring all state variables which practically is not true for reasons of high cost and reliability. In [ 27 29 ] model predictive control (MPC) was utilized to regulate BGL of T1DP, it has the ability to deal with parametric uncertainty of glucose-insulin physiological system however the computational of iterative online optimization process is complex and its efficiency depends on how the accuracy of the predicted output is, in [ 30 ] nonlinear explicit MPC (NEMPC) was used to avoid the computational complexity of iterative online optimization, in [ 31 ] the output error state observer was used with MPC to correct the output variable prediction and hence improve the performance of the MPC, also in [ 32 ] extended kalman filter was used with NEMPC to estimate unavailable states for T1DP to improve the accuracy of the predicted BGL. To deal with unmeasured state variables, observer was used in conjunction with nonlinear adaptive controller in [ 33 ], with backstepping controller in [ 9 ], and with predictor feedback controller in [ 34 ] to estimate unmeasured state variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulation of blood glucose levels in T1DM patients is a type of difficult control problem. Most of the techniques employ simple solutions from proportional-integral (PI) and proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers (Paiva et al, 2020) to fuzzy control (Kang et al, 2018), reinforcement learning (RL) (Lee et al, 2020), and recently, MPC (Birjandi et al, 2022) to solve this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%