1993
DOI: 10.1177/089686089301302s57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin Prescription, Glycemic Control, and Diabetic Complications in Diabetics Treated by Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraperitoneal insulin administration is a more physiological alternative than the subcutaneous route because insulin absorption from parietal peritoneum and its subsequent portal venous delivery mimic endogenous insulin secretion without affecting dialysis efficacy [96,99–101]. Insulin requirements increase two‐ or threefold when insulin is intraperitoneally administered along with the dialysis fluid despite hyperinsulinaemia decreases [100,102–104]. Reasons for this higher exogenous insulin need are glucose absorption from peritoneum, delayed insulin absorption consequential to dilution by the fluid, insulin adsorption to the plastic surface of the dialysis solution delivery systems and insulin elimination in the non‐absorbed effluent.…”
Section: Insulin Therapy In Patients With Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraperitoneal insulin administration is a more physiological alternative than the subcutaneous route because insulin absorption from parietal peritoneum and its subsequent portal venous delivery mimic endogenous insulin secretion without affecting dialysis efficacy [96,99–101]. Insulin requirements increase two‐ or threefold when insulin is intraperitoneally administered along with the dialysis fluid despite hyperinsulinaemia decreases [100,102–104]. Reasons for this higher exogenous insulin need are glucose absorption from peritoneum, delayed insulin absorption consequential to dilution by the fluid, insulin adsorption to the plastic surface of the dialysis solution delivery systems and insulin elimination in the non‐absorbed effluent.…”
Section: Insulin Therapy In Patients With Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-randomized studies of diabetic patient on PD, glycemic control with IP insulin treatment, as assessed with HbA 1C , was better than that obtained with SC insulin [8,9,19,30]. e analysis of the results of three studies showed that the HbA 1C was -1.49 % lower in the IP group (SMD -1.49 % CI -2.17 to -0.27, p=0.0001) with no heterogeneity (0=0.80 and I2= 0%).…”
Section: E Ect Of Insulin Route Of Administration On Hba1cmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…ere are also some possible drawbacks to IP insulin relative to the SC route including higher insulin requirements, lower HDL cholesterol levels and higher TG levels. e increased insulin requirement using the IP route is related to several factors including hepatic insulin degradation as in physiological circumstances, incomplete peritoneal absorption of insulin (which is concentration-and time-dependent), possible intraperitoneal degradation of insulin by insulinase enzymes, degradation within adipocytes and adsorption of insulin to the surface of uid containers and connecting tubing [9]. Several studies have suggested that the IP administration of insulin can restore glucose levels to near normal values [10], but the available evidence is limited either because only a small number of subjects were used or because glycemic control was not the primary outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study demonstrated that a 25% reduction in basal insulin after hemodialysis can avoid hypoglycemia [47]. However, continuous absorption of glucose from the dialysate may impair blood glucose control for dialysis patients, and the requirements for insulin increase by 2-to 3-fold [48,49]. Intraperitoneal insulin usually leads to better blood glucose control and lower insulin demand than subcutaneous injection [50][51][52].…”
Section: Glycemic Targets In Dkdmentioning
confidence: 99%