2018
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v115/i2/338-346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Assessment of Drought Vulnerability Using Indicators for Dhasan Basin in Bundelkhand Region, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract: The present study has integrated both spatially and temporally varying drought vulnerability factors to develop an integrated drought vulnerability map for Dhasan basin. A drought vulnerability index is used to classify the study area into different vulnerability zones. From the drought vulnerability assessment for the study area during July 2002, it was observed that the northeast, northwest and extreme southern part of the basin (20% area) was under critical vulnerability condition whereas the southwest and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sensitive index is formed by combining the different satellite-based drought indicators with the help of GIS overlay method. According to Sensitivity Index, the study area is divided into ve sub classes, namely 'very high' (81-100), 'high'(61-80), 'medium' (41-60), 'low' (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) and 'very poor' (0-20) covering an area of 54.66, 257.85, 590.52, 869.96 and 171.01 sq km accounting 2.83, 13.33, 30.53, 44.47 and 8.84%, respectively, of the total area (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sensitive index is formed by combining the different satellite-based drought indicators with the help of GIS overlay method. According to Sensitivity Index, the study area is divided into ve sub classes, namely 'very high' (81-100), 'high'(61-80), 'medium' (41-60), 'low' (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) and 'very poor' (0-20) covering an area of 54.66, 257.85, 590.52, 869.96 and 171.01 sq km accounting 2.83, 13.33, 30.53, 44.47 and 8.84%, respectively, of the total area (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agricultural drought, it is expressed as the response or sensitivity degree of crop growth to the loss of water deficit intensity in growth period (Xu et al 2010). At present, the research on agricultural drought mainly focuses on drought risk assessment (Hoque et al 2021;Jin et al 2016), drought vulnerability assessment (Cui et al 2019;Tanago et al 2018), and drought warning (Kar et al 2018;Ewbank et al 2019), but most of them are in view of the whole growth period, and the difference in water sensitivity of crops in different growth periods will lead to different drought losses. Huang et al (2019) used crop model to simulate the effect of drought of different durations at the seedling, jointing, and filling stages on corn yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, different sets of drought parameters have been taken into consideration in a study conducted by Kar et al (2018) to identify the vulnerable regions through assigning appropriate weights parameters. The Standardized Drought Vulnerability Index (SDVI) is an index developed by Oikonomou et al (2019) which incorporates precipitation patterns, the supply and demand trends, and the socio-economic background to drought vulnerability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%