2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs. local optimum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently form Chen et al (2009a), these authors do not linearize their model but claim the existence and the uniqueness of optimal weights μ js , υ ls , ν if , ω f and ω s . Unfortunately, Lim and Zhu (2013) show that such a conclusion is a false statement. They also show how the two-stage DEA model proposed in Chiou and Lan (2007) can be transformed into a parametric linear program.…”
Section: Variable Returns To Scale and Additive Measures Of Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Differently form Chen et al (2009a), these authors do not linearize their model but claim the existence and the uniqueness of optimal weights μ js , υ ls , ν if , ω f and ω s . Unfortunately, Lim and Zhu (2013) show that such a conclusion is a false statement. They also show how the two-stage DEA model proposed in Chiou and Lan (2007) can be transformed into a parametric linear program.…”
Section: Variable Returns To Scale and Additive Measures Of Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Notwithstanding, their developments have serious flaws. Despite they claim any optimal solutions determined by their DEA model are global, but Lima and Zhu (2013) indicated that such a conclusion is a false statement due to their misuse of Hessian matrix in examining concavity of objective function, and their DEA model is actually a non-convex optimisation problem. As a result, their DEA model is unusable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Through multiple tests, the results from this model were highly robust with different initial variable values, and the calculation also showed good convergence and high accuracy. Therefore, we have a good reason to believe that the calculation result from this model is the global optimal solution rather than the local optimal solution of our optimization problem [34][35][36].…”
Section: Dea Model With Dual Target Variablementioning
confidence: 99%