2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0937-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated FDG-PET-CT: its role in the assessment of bone and soft tissue tumors

Abstract: Combined FDG-PET-CT reliably differentiates soft tissue and bone tumors from benign lesions. The value of the information provided by FDG-PET-CT for planning surgical procedures must be evaluated in further studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recently FDG-PET/CT analysis has been re-examined and its efficiency was investigated (20). Bischoff et al (21) reported that the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in soft tissue and osseous tumors had a sensitivity of 69–80%, a specificity of 83–100% and an accuracy of 79–86%; although their criteria for interpreting malignant tumors were obscure and required the judgment of radiologists from numerous sources of information for conventional imaging. Charest et al (20) demonstrated a high sensitivity for the accurate discrimination between low- and high-grade sarcomas, however, not between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently FDG-PET/CT analysis has been re-examined and its efficiency was investigated (20). Bischoff et al (21) reported that the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in soft tissue and osseous tumors had a sensitivity of 69–80%, a specificity of 83–100% and an accuracy of 79–86%; although their criteria for interpreting malignant tumors were obscure and required the judgment of radiologists from numerous sources of information for conventional imaging. Charest et al (20) demonstrated a high sensitivity for the accurate discrimination between low- and high-grade sarcomas, however, not between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] Furthermore, 18 F-FDG PET-CT has been shown to better differentiate soft-tissue and osseous malignancies from benign lesions compared to PET or CT alone. [38][39][40][41] In addition to 18 F-FDG, several novel PET radiotracers have shown promising results. 18 F-Fluoroestradiol, which targets estrogen receptors (ER) has been shown to have a high sensitivity for the detection of ER-positive skeletal metastases and is useful for quantifying in vivo ER expression without the need for biopsy.…”
Section: Figure 1: From Omics To Molecular Imaging and Precision Medi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological imaging modalities, specifically CT and MRI, are known to have limitations in differential diagnosis, and FDG PET/CT using tumor lesion SUV has been reported to better guide differential diagnosis [129,130]. However, a certain amount of overlap in FDG uptake exists between malignant and benign tumors and between low-grade and high-grade sarcomas [129][130][131][132].…”
Section: Sarcomamentioning
confidence: 99%