2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2005.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated geophysical investigations in the Hisar geothermal field, Demirci, western Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, geophysical methods have been commonly used in the investigation and development of geothermal resources, especially with the development of technology, and these methods have provided successful results (Majumdar et al 2000;El-Quady 2006;Özürlan and Şahin 2006;Drahor and Berge 2006;Abiye and Haile 2008;Wu et al 2012). Although many geophysical methods are used in geothermal fields, electrical resistivity is one of the most preferred methods for investigating many geothermal fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, geophysical methods have been commonly used in the investigation and development of geothermal resources, especially with the development of technology, and these methods have provided successful results (Majumdar et al 2000;El-Quady 2006;Özürlan and Şahin 2006;Drahor and Berge 2006;Abiye and Haile 2008;Wu et al 2012). Although many geophysical methods are used in geothermal fields, electrical resistivity is one of the most preferred methods for investigating many geothermal fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, two potential electrodes, M and N, are connected to a voltameter. The current intensity parameters are arranged in series, and the potential difference ΔV between electrodes M and N are measured [12], [24]. Mathematically, apparent resistivity ρA is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Electrical Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the success and application potential of the individual techniques, it would be reasonable to assume that integrated ERT, SP and GPR surveys are common in near‐surface hydrological contexts. In the past few years, self‐potential has been combined with other geophysical methods, including ERT and electromagnetics (Sharma and Baranwal ; Ozurlan and Sahin ; Wishart et al . ) whilst combining ERT and GPR has always been popular.…”
Section: Geophysical Techniques For Near‐surface Hydrological Investmentioning
confidence: 99%