2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2017.2716184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Optical Link on Si Substrate Using Membrane Distributed-Feedback Laser and p-i-n Photodiode

Abstract: On-chip optical interconnection is a promising technology for wiring future large-scale integrated circuits, as a means to mitigate the considerable power dissipation of traditional wiring layers. Here, we fabricate an integrated optical link using a membrane distributed-feedback (DFB) laser and a p-i-n photodiode (PD) in a butt-jointed built-in coupling geometry. The optical link is formed on a Si substrate by benzocyclobutene bonding. The integrated DFB laser shows a low-threshold current of 0.48 mA. Light t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the losses including electronic-to-optic conversion loss, butt-coupling loss and optic-to-electronic conversion loss are larger than 99%. Although the calculated SU-8 waveguide loss coefficient is larger than those in the typical laser-to-PD interconnects [14][15][16], it is not the main factor for the current transfer loss in our interconnects. The large waveguide loss is attributed to the light escape associated with the broad-angle emission of the LED into the limited numerical aperture waveguide, the waveguide scattering and inefficient collection of the light by the PD rather than the absorption since the extinction coefficient of the SU-8 at infrared wavelengths is very low [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This indicates that the losses including electronic-to-optic conversion loss, butt-coupling loss and optic-to-electronic conversion loss are larger than 99%. Although the calculated SU-8 waveguide loss coefficient is larger than those in the typical laser-to-PD interconnects [14][15][16], it is not the main factor for the current transfer loss in our interconnects. The large waveguide loss is attributed to the light escape associated with the broad-angle emission of the LED into the limited numerical aperture waveguide, the waveguide scattering and inefficient collection of the light by the PD rather than the absorption since the extinction coefficient of the SU-8 at infrared wavelengths is very low [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Another approach with similarly high optical confinement is the InP membranes [23][24][25]. An example of a twin-guide integration scheme is depicted in Figure 1(c) [23].…”
Section: Photonic Integration Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulted refractive index contrast is therefore very similar to that of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) waveguides. An advantage of the InP membranes is the flexibility of innovation in the active layerstack, to reduce the active/passive coupling length [23] and enhance fill factor in quantum wells (QWs) [24]. Another advantage is the possibility of realizing functional structures on both sides of the membrane [26].…”
Section: Photonic Integration Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables novel devices like a high-gain optical amplifier (SOA) [2], a high-speed uni-traveling-carrier photodetector (UTC-PD) [3], and an electro-optic polymer phase modulator (EOPPM) [4]. Other InP-based membrane integration schemes focus on on-chip and chip-to-chip optical interconnects and have demonstrated high efficiency lasers with low thresholds [5,6]. With the platform proposed here we aim for generic integration of building blocks, so that it can be used in a wider range of applications.…”
Section: Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%