2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1031728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated single-cell and transcriptome sequencing analyses determines a chromatin regulator-based signature for evaluating prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract: BackgroundAccumulating evidence has highlighted the significance of chromatin regulator (CR) in pathogenesis and progression of cancer. However, the prognostic role of CRs in LUAD remains obscure. We aim to detect the prognostic value of CRs in LUAD and create favorable signature for assessing prognosis and clinical value of LUAD patients.MethodsThe mRNA sequencing data and clinical information were obtained from TCGA and GEO databases. Gene consensus clustering analysis was utilized to determine the molecular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results provided new perspectives for LUAD prognosis management. A recent study also explored the function of CR in LUAD [ 25 ]. But there were still some obviously different between our study and previous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results provided new perspectives for LUAD prognosis management. A recent study also explored the function of CR in LUAD [ 25 ]. But there were still some obviously different between our study and previous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BUB1 was found as a prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma [ 52 ]. In addition, some new prognostic CRs have also been identified in LUAD, such as NPAS2 and HMGA2 [ 53 , 54 ]. In this study, an interesting finding is that CIT was highly expressed as a protective gene in LUAD tissue, and the high expression of CIT was significantly associated with a high OS rate ( Figure 14B ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic markers and the indications for prognosis in these studies are summarized in Table 2 . 36 , 44 , 45 , 47 49 , 55 89 DEGs and their combined prognostic model were the most common types of prognostic markers in these studies. For example, one study identified nine cancer-specific DEGs (CBFA2T3, CR2, SEL1L3, TM6SF1, TSPAN32, ITGA6, MAPK11, RASA3, and TLR6) and established a prognostic risk model in combination with clinical factors.…”
Section: The Prognostic Time Markers For Luadmentioning
confidence: 91%