2015 American Control Conference (ACC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2015.7171804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating robust lidar-based feedforward with feedback control to enhance speed regulation of floating wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blade effective wind speed is an estimate of the wind that flows around the blade in order to produce torque for the generator. A later study [27] looked to extend the control techniques used in [25], using a H ∞ control design for a floating offshore wind turbine. With the use of lidar, simulation results showed that a H ∞ feedforwardfeedback controller was able to reduce the standard deviation of the rated generator speed by 44% and load mitigation was observed as well [27].…”
Section: B Pitch Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The blade effective wind speed is an estimate of the wind that flows around the blade in order to produce torque for the generator. A later study [27] looked to extend the control techniques used in [25], using a H ∞ control design for a floating offshore wind turbine. With the use of lidar, simulation results showed that a H ∞ feedforwardfeedback controller was able to reduce the standard deviation of the rated generator speed by 44% and load mitigation was observed as well [27].…”
Section: B Pitch Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A later study [27] looked to extend the control techniques used in [25], using a H ∞ control design for a floating offshore wind turbine. With the use of lidar, simulation results showed that a H ∞ feedforwardfeedback controller was able to reduce the standard deviation of the rated generator speed by 44% and load mitigation was observed as well [27]. Later, a study [7] used the Bladed turbine simulator, rather than the FAST turbine simulator that was used in [23], [22], [24].…”
Section: B Pitch Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various control algorithms attempt to achieve efficiency and platform motion suppressions by controlling the blade pitch actuator and generator torque of wind turbine. There have been numerous controllers designed to address the shortcomings of floating platform using a range of controllers, such as Proportional Integral (PI), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Linear Parameter Varying (LPV), and Model Predictive Control (MPC) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Some advanced control algorithms utilize the blade pitch mechanism by actuating blades identically (Collective blade pitch) or separately (Individual blade pitch) to provide the wind turbine required aerodynamic thrust to suppress platform motions, maximize power generation and load mitigation.…”
Section: Floating Platform and Associated Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement uncertainty can vary with wind speed, wind shear, turbulence intensity, etc. (Navalkar et al (2015)), thus, multiplicative diagonal complex uncertainties were considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%