1983
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90198-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating visual information from successive fixations:Does trans-saccadic fusion exist?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results on transsaccadic integration have been mixed, with reports of no integration (47)(48)(49), as well as evidence for integration of shape and motion across saccades (50)(51)(52)(53), with recent results showing integration of 3D information across multiple spatial locations (54). Given the particular slowness of 3D vision (55,56) compared with the typically brief time between saccades, transsaccadic integration of 3D information would be especially valuable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results on transsaccadic integration have been mixed, with reports of no integration (47)(48)(49), as well as evidence for integration of shape and motion across saccades (50)(51)(52)(53), with recent results showing integration of 3D information across multiple spatial locations (54). Given the particular slowness of 3D vision (55,56) compared with the typically brief time between saccades, transsaccadic integration of 3D information would be especially valuable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these investigations reported that readers use word length information to program saccades to target the word center, the optimal viewing position, OVP (Nuthmann, Engbert, & Kliegl, 2005;O'Regan & Lévy-Schoen, 1983;Vitu, O'Regan, & Mittau, 1990). Typically, however, readers' initial fixation falls short of its target and lands between word beginning and center, at the so-called preferred viewing location (PVL, Rayner 1979; see also McConkie, Kerr, Reddix, & Zola, 1988;McConkie, Kerr, Reddix, Zola, & Jacobs, 1989;Rayner et al, 1998;Vitu et al, 1990).…”
Section: The N Umbe Rnofnconstitue Ntnle Tte Rsnandnspatialnexte Ntnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the intuitive appeal of this hypothesis, ample empirical evidence has demonstrated that it is probably wrong. Several investigators have found that subjects are unable to fuse pre-and postsaccadic patterns in successive fixations to obtain an integrated composite pattern (e.g., Irwin, 1983;O'Regan and Levy-Schoen, 1983;Rayner and Pollatsek, 1983; for a comprehensive overview see also Irwin, 1993a). Moreover, it has been shown that changing the visual characteristics of words and pictures, such as object size or letter case, has no disruptive effect on word or picture naming (e.g., McConkie and Zola, 1979;Rayner et al, 1980).…”
Section: Transsaccadic Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%